are outside these limits. Again, no explanation for the variations is available, The large variations occurred at the 50-p.p.m. level.Twelve 0.1-gram standard samples were run by the spectrographic method in laboratory E. The data were presented previously (B). As the spectrographic method relies on the use of standard samples, and because at that time there were no others available, a direct comparison between hydrogen extracted and hydrogen added was impossible. However, a plot of the log of the ratio of hydrogen-to-argon line intensities, /H6562A. to /6752A., VS. the log of hydrogen added gave a straight line through the data. From the line, it was possible to compare the results of any one sample with all the others if the spectrometer readings are assumed to be truly representative of the hydrogen contents of the samples. This assumption may not be valid as the technique was still in the development stage.The hydrogen values from the straight line are compared with the hydrogen added values in Table I. The data show that eight of the 12 samples agree with the spectrographic line to within 3%, while one falls outside this but is within 6%. Three values fall outside these limits. In general, this is a good indication that there is some degree of agreement between the standard samples and the spectrographic results.
LITERATURE CITED