2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:jmsc.0000047538.95825.ad
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative analysis of grain size in bimodal powders by x-ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Klug and Alexander have reported that this approximation well represents the intrinsic broadening [16]. Furthermore, suppose that the grain size and micro-strain broadening were described by using Cauchy-Gaussian (CG) relationship, He et al and Zang et al reported that the CG approximation is the most appropriate method for the linear fitting for grain size and micro-strain [17,18]; the following equation can be derived:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Klug and Alexander have reported that this approximation well represents the intrinsic broadening [16]. Furthermore, suppose that the grain size and micro-strain broadening were described by using Cauchy-Gaussian (CG) relationship, He et al and Zang et al reported that the CG approximation is the most appropriate method for the linear fitting for grain size and micro-strain [17,18]; the following equation can be derived:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results reported by several investigators [17,[30][31][32] indicated that the measurements obtained from both methods were comparable. However, recent studies [33][34][35] have demonstrated that grain size measurements from XRD lead to underestimation when deviations in narrow grain size distributions occurred.…”
Section: A Microstructure Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A major difference between these two functions is that Lorentzian profile has flatter tails (extends for a greater deviation away from the Bragg peak) than a Gaussian distribution exhibiting an equal FWHM. The application of both the Lorentzian and Gaussian diffraction profiles is based on the experimental usefulness [22,26,27] of both these functions in describing peak broadening and not a fundamental first principles relationship with either domain size or microstrain. To improve the fitting of either (or both) the Gaussian or Lorentzian profile to peak broadening, a combination of the two profiles can be used in a Voigt function [22,25,27] (i.e., broadening due to both domain size and microstrain strain contains both a Lorentzian and Gaussian component [16,25].…”
Section: Profile Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%