2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.10.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative analysis of grain boundaries in carbon- and nitrogen-added ferritic steels by atom probe tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
19
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
5
19
2
Order By: Relevance
“…They thought that this was because grain boundary ledges were suppressed to act as dislocation sources by grain boundary segregation of carbon, based on the grain boundary ledge mechanism for explaining HallPetch relationship by Li,4) although no evidence of grain boundary segregation and no evidence supporting that the grain boundary ledges were the main dislocation sources in the materials were shown. 6) Takahashi et al 7) carried out 3-dimensional atom-probe analysis of the pure irons used in Ref. 6) and confirmed segregation of carbon and nitrogen atoms at grain boundaries.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They thought that this was because grain boundary ledges were suppressed to act as dislocation sources by grain boundary segregation of carbon, based on the grain boundary ledge mechanism for explaining HallPetch relationship by Li,4) although no evidence of grain boundary segregation and no evidence supporting that the grain boundary ledges were the main dislocation sources in the materials were shown. 6) Takahashi et al 7) carried out 3-dimensional atom-probe analysis of the pure irons used in Ref. 6) and confirmed segregation of carbon and nitrogen atoms at grain boundaries.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…They also discussed a significant difference between carbon and nitrogen in the effects on HallPetch slope (if the grain boundary segregation really controlled k y ), but the reason of the difference was unclear. 6,7) According to the grain boundary ledge model, if the carbon content is constant in the material, a decrease in k y is expected by grain refinement because the density of carbon on the grain boundary decreases with increasing the grain boundary area per unit volume (i.e., with decreasing the mean grain size). Such a decreasing in k y by grain refinement (in the range of several hundred nm to several µm) has not been found in any previous experiments, but an extra hardening has rather been reported in ultrafine grained materials.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 12 displays the results of three-dimensional (3D) atom probe analysis showing the amount of C and N segregated at the grain boundaries in FeC and FeN alloys. 27) Each specimen was prepared to have the same atomic fraction of C or N, 0.02 at%, and it was confirmed that the amount of solute C and N was 0.0019 at% in both specimens. However, apparent differences can be seen between carbon and nitrogen in terms of grain-boundary segregation behavior, in that carbon has an approximately 34 times greater segregation potential.…”
Section: Grain-boundary Segregation Of Carbon and Nitrogenmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Furthermore, it is recently revealed that the segregation of alloy elements, such as C, N and Ni, at grain boundary can raise the yield strength up by increase of stress for generating dislocation from grain boundaries. 19,20) The effect of the segregation at the grain boundary to the strength at high temperature is also should be taken into account, but will be discussed in the future.…”
Section: The Influence Of Nbc(n) Clustersmentioning
confidence: 99%