2002
DOI: 10.4314/eamj.v79i8.8828
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative analysis of gai pattern in hemiparetic patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike the increase in the BOS commonly observed in human patients, there was no apparent difference in the BOS in either fore or hind paws detected between mice with CCI and sham surgery, although we can not predict if change in BOS only becomes apparent in animals with much more severe head injury. The variability in stride length or stride time has been reported in human TBI patients (Katz-Leurer et al 2008; Zverev et al 2002), particularly when the complexity of the gait task increased (Niechwiej-Szwedo et al 2007), suggesting that the ability to maintain a relationship between the center of mass and BOS was compromised after head injury. However, gait variability in mice with CCI injury did not differ from that in sham mice in our current study (data not shown), possibly due to the limited number of steps allowed in the current catwalk setup.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Unlike the increase in the BOS commonly observed in human patients, there was no apparent difference in the BOS in either fore or hind paws detected between mice with CCI and sham surgery, although we can not predict if change in BOS only becomes apparent in animals with much more severe head injury. The variability in stride length or stride time has been reported in human TBI patients (Katz-Leurer et al 2008; Zverev et al 2002), particularly when the complexity of the gait task increased (Niechwiej-Szwedo et al 2007), suggesting that the ability to maintain a relationship between the center of mass and BOS was compromised after head injury. However, gait variability in mice with CCI injury did not differ from that in sham mice in our current study (data not shown), possibly due to the limited number of steps allowed in the current catwalk setup.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The metabolic sensitivity to gait variability may also be higher in older adults for whom active balance requires greater attentional resources [24]. Hemiplegics also take considerably wider and more variable steps [6, 25] and expend more energy to walk than healthy controls at preferred speed [9]. Our results suggest that changes in step parameters associated with unsteady gait may explain some of the greater energetic cost of walking observed due to age or disability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…But even apparently steady gait has small step-by-step variations, which may in part be associated with noisy fluctuations in muscle force, imperfect sensorimotor control, and perturbations from the environment [1]. These variations have also been observed to increase with some gait deficits as well as with age [2-6]. Step variability might also contribute to energy expenditure, for example due to the effort expended to make feedback corrections to reduce these variations and maintain stability, or simply because the nominal gait is energetically economical and deviations from it are more costly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Temporal (e.g., stride time) and spatial (e.g., stride length) parameters are used to examine variation in human gait. Gait stability has been assessed efficiently using the variability measure not only in elderly subjects (Gabell and Nayak 1984;Stolze et al 2000), but also in physically disabled post-stroke patients (Zverev et al 2002) and patients with Parkinson's disease (Vieregge et al 1997). In fact, Gabell and Nayak (1984) reported that in both older and younger groups, the gait-patterning mechanism (step length and stride time) is more consistent than the balance-control mechanism (step width and double-support time) and that increased variability in gait is not necessarily a normal concomitant of old age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%