2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.zool.2019.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative analysis of forebrain pallial morphology in monotremes and comparison with that in therians

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We quantified the overall volume of the cerebellum and found that it scales with brain volume when compared to other mammals ( Fig. 7 D ), further demonstrating that the thylacine brain shows highly conserved trends with other species ( 36 , 47 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We quantified the overall volume of the cerebellum and found that it scales with brain volume when compared to other mammals ( Fig. 7 D ), further demonstrating that the thylacine brain shows highly conserved trends with other species ( 36 , 47 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…3 ). However, thylacine gyrification is remarkably lower than eutherians of similar brain size ( 35 , 36 ), as evidenced by the slopes of their regression lines ( Fig. 3 A ) and by direct comparison with a representative example of the highly convoluted brain of a mid-sized canid, the red fox ( Vulpes vulpes ; Figs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For this, we curated published GI values for each genus; any species in a genus with a GI value above 1.2 was considered gyrencephalic (Figures 6A-C). When GI values were not available, brain image data from the Comparative Mammalian Brain Collection and published statements describing species as gyrencephalic or lissencephalic were used for this classification (Harper and Maser, 1976;Sullivan, 1982;Kawamoto et al, 1998;Phelps and Young, 2003;Xiao et al, 2006;Marino, 2007;Morawski et al, 2010;Lewitus et al, 2013;Zilles et al, 2013;Mota and Herculano-Houzel, 2015;Bhagwandin et al, 2017;Spocter et al, 2017;Raghanti et al, 2018;Ashwell and Gurovich, 2019;Marchand and Schwartz, 2019). The collection available at 2 was used in our binary classification system.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Relationship Between Nde1 and High-order Gyrifimentioning
confidence: 99%