2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062583
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Analysis of Food and Feed Samples with Droplet Digital PCR

Abstract: In this study, the applicability of droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) for routine analysis in food and feed samples was demonstrated with the quantification of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) is currently used for quantitative molecular analysis of the presence of GMOs in products. However, its use is limited for detecting and quantifying very small numbers of DNA targets, as in some complex food and feed matrices. Using ddPCR duplex assay, we have measu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
158
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 244 publications
(172 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
13
158
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While the ddPCR assay was lower in sensitivity, other criteria required for operation are comparable to or even surpass those of the qPCR assay. ddPCR is known to provide several advantages over qPCR: it is less susceptible to PCR inhibition and high background DNA levels; it gives absolute quantification without relying on an external standard reference; and it is more precise than qPCR (20)(21)(22). Our findings are in agreement with those previous observations showing that the ddPCR method was indeed higher in precision for either plasmid standard or environmental sample analysis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While the ddPCR assay was lower in sensitivity, other criteria required for operation are comparable to or even surpass those of the qPCR assay. ddPCR is known to provide several advantages over qPCR: it is less susceptible to PCR inhibition and high background DNA levels; it gives absolute quantification without relying on an external standard reference; and it is more precise than qPCR (20)(21)(22). Our findings are in agreement with those previous observations showing that the ddPCR method was indeed higher in precision for either plasmid standard or environmental sample analysis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The intrinsic nature of ddPCR allows detection of rare nucleic acids in the presence of a high abundance of standard sequences (15). The applications of this technology have mainly been focused on clinical research and diagnosis, genetic modification, food product screening, and viral surveillance (17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23), while the potential of using ddPCR in environmental studies has yet to be explored.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method relies on limiting dilutions of the PCR volume and Poisson statistics (9,14 ). After the dilutions, the PCR mix is distributed into fractions, and each reaction is independently interrogated for the copy number of the target nucleic acids at a single-molecule sensitivity (15 ).…”
Section: © 2014 American Association For Clinical Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the number of dyes that can currently be detected, the occurrence of false positives when the targets to be multiplexed become too numerous and/ or may interact and the loss of sensitivity. Furthermore, high-throughput technologies, as, for instance, NASBA implemented microarray analysis (NAIMA) [23,24], microdroplet PCR implemented capillary gel electrophoresis (MPIC) [25], multiplex ligation detection methods [26] (and references therein), a combined microchip-PCR and microarray system (MACRO) [27], digital PCR [28,29] and next-generation sequencing (NGS) [30][31][32], have been developed and their possible use in GMO detection was demonstrated. These methods are, however, still too costly and/or cumbersome for routine use and often require expensive equipment and/or specialised data analysis tools and staff.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%