2012
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Analysis of Focused A-To-I RNA Editing Sites by Ultra-High-Throughput Sequencing in Psychiatric Disorders

Abstract: A-to-I RNA editing is a post-transcriptional modification of single nucleotides in RNA by adenosine deamination, which thereby diversifies the gene products encoded in the genome. Thousands of potential RNA editing sites have been identified by recent studies (e.g. see Li et al, Science 2009); however, only a handful of these sites have been independently confirmed. Here, we systematically and quantitatively examined 109 putative coding region A-to-I RNA editing sites in three sets of normal human brain sample… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the variability of RNA editing is not significantly different within the 10 regions as compared to the 13 DLPFC, suggesting RNA editing is tightly regulated at these 12 sites. These findings could be driven by our stringent criteria for designating RNA editing sites, but other studies have found similarly consistent levels of intra- versus inter-individual adenosine-to-inosine editing [40] and at greater depth in the brain [41]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In addition, the variability of RNA editing is not significantly different within the 10 regions as compared to the 13 DLPFC, suggesting RNA editing is tightly regulated at these 12 sites. These findings could be driven by our stringent criteria for designating RNA editing sites, but other studies have found similarly consistent levels of intra- versus inter-individual adenosine-to-inosine editing [40] and at greater depth in the brain [41]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Partially edited isoforms exhibit profiles between these two extremes. Although these multiple isoforms are predicted as key in 5-HT 2C R function, there are no published methods to separately analyze expression of isoform-specific proteins; however, high-throughput sequencing provides the opportunity to evaluate expression of mRNA for all 5-HT 2C R isoforms across phenotypes (Morabito et al, 2010;Zhu et al, 2012).…”
Section: Impaired 5-ht 2c R Functional Status May Underlie Impulsive mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RNA extracted from the mPFC collected from HI and LI rats was analyzed for efficiency of editing at each of the five editing sites (A, B, E, C, D) as well as the frequency of mRNA variants using high-throughput multiplexed transcript analysis (Morabito et al, 2010;Zhu et al, 2012); all 32 possible mRNA variants were detected in the rat mPFC (Supplementary Table 2). A main effect of phenotype (F (1,56) ¼ 9.86, po0.01), site (F (4,56) ¼ 22744.6, po0.001), and a phenotype  site interaction (F (4,56) ¼ 3.22, po0.05) on editing efficiency at the five editing sites was observed; HI rats expressed higher levels of editing at the E and D sites vs LI rats (Figure 3d; po0.05).…”
Section: Impaired 5-ht 2c R Functional Status May Underlie Impulsive mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, only male rats were analyzed, so sex specific effects cannot be ruled out. However, no differences in RNA editing have been reported to date between sexes (Zhu et al 2012), and no differences in gender were observed during aging in humans (Nicholas et al 2010). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%