2022
DOI: 10.1002/ldr.4277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative analysis of ecological risk and human health risk of potentially toxic elements in farmland soil using the PMF model

Abstract: Potentially toxic element (PTE) pollution in farmland soil is a global problem. It is vital to clarify the contributions of farmland soil PTE from different sources to potential ecological risk (PER) and human health risks (HHR), but the existing research methods were incomplete. This study explored a comprehensive scheme that combined source contribution and risk assessment to quantitatively assess PER, HHR and the priority pollution sources. enrichment factor (EF) and pollution load index (PLI) were utilized… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For HQ with different exposure routes of the same PTE, each soil PTE presented the risk of oral ingestion > oral and nasal inhalation risk > skin contact risk. The result was in agreement with the reports 14 , 37 . Therefore, oral intake was the main exposure route of non-carcinogenic risk, and oral intake of Cr and Pb caused serious non-carcinogenic risk to children.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…For HQ with different exposure routes of the same PTE, each soil PTE presented the risk of oral ingestion > oral and nasal inhalation risk > skin contact risk. The result was in agreement with the reports 14 , 37 . Therefore, oral intake was the main exposure route of non-carcinogenic risk, and oral intake of Cr and Pb caused serious non-carcinogenic risk to children.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…For HQ with different exposure routes of the same PTE, each soil PTE presented the risk of oral ingestion > oral and nasal inhalation risk > skin contact risk. The result was in agreement with the reports 11,33 . Therefore, oral intake was the main exposure route of non-carcinogenic risk, and oral intake of Cr and Pb caused serious non-carcinogenic risk to children.…”
Section: Human Health Risk Assessmentsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…In terms of carcinogenic risk, the total TCR values of PTEs for adults and children were on the order of 1E−05, within the range of 1E−06 and 1E−04, indicating that the carcinogenic risk of soil PTEs for the human body is acceptable in the study area. In general, the noncarcinogenic and carcinogenic risks of PTEs from different sources in children were higher than those in adults, which can be explained by children having more opportunities PTE contamination through hand-to-mouth ingestion and dermal contact than adults due to the areas where they play and unhealthy eating habits (e.g., children are more likely to suck their fingers) 79 . Therefore, different parameters were set when employing the health risk assessment model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%