2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative analysis of drugs in hair by UHPLC high resolution mass spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interest is currently focused on the quantification of drugs in PM materials other than blood, including bile, brain, liver, muscle, and vitreous humor . However, while these alternative materials show promising results with individual drugs or in specific circumstances, femoral venous blood still represents the most viable material for interpretative purposes in PM toxicology, with a more extensive range of reference concentrations published in the literature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interest is currently focused on the quantification of drugs in PM materials other than blood, including bile, brain, liver, muscle, and vitreous humor . However, while these alternative materials show promising results with individual drugs or in specific circumstances, femoral venous blood still represents the most viable material for interpretative purposes in PM toxicology, with a more extensive range of reference concentrations published in the literature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zolpidem has been determined in several biological matrices (oral fluid, hair, plasma, nails, serum, urine and blood) and by several methods: capillary electrophoresis (Hempel & Blaschke, 1996), radioimmunoassay (de Clerck & Daenens, 1997), reversed-phase chromatography with fluorescence (Ptacek, Macek, & Klima, 1997), gas chromatography (Gaillard, Gay-Montchamp, & Ollagnier, 1993;Stanke, Jourdil, Lauby, & Bessard, 1996), gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), HPLC with fluorimetric or UV detection (Ascalone, Flaminio, Guinebault, Thenot, & Morselli, 1992;Debailleul, Khalil, & Lheureux, 1991;Durol & Greenblatt, 1997;Guinebault, Dubruc, Hermann, & Thenot, 1986;Nirogi, Kandikere, Shrivasthava, & Mudigonda, 2006;Tracqui, Kintz, & Mangin, 1993), GC/MS (Keller, Schneider, & Tutsch-Bauer, 1999;Lichtenwalner & Tully, 1997;Wang, Sun, & Lau, 1999), LC/MS (Giroud, Augsburger, Menetrey, & Mangin, 2003), LC/MS/MS (Byeon et al, 2015;Jang et al, 2013;Jeong et al, 2015;Miyaguchi, 2013;Moretti et al, 2018), UHPLC/MS/MS (Eliassen & Kristoffersen, 2014;Marin, Roberts, Wood, & McMillin, 2012), UHPLC-Q-TOF-LC/MS (Kronstrand et al, 2018) and UPLC-MS-MS (Reddy, Bapuji, Rao, Himabindu, & Ravinder, 2012). The HPLC or UPLC coupled to tandem mass spectrometry in plasma has an LOQ of 0.1-1.8 ng/ml, RT 0.7-1.76 min, run time 2.5-4.5 min, liquid-liquid extraction, 100 μl of plasma (Byeon et al, 2015;Marin et al, 2012;Reddy et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We searched the literature and could not find a basis for reported levels of acceptability of NIST standards on various instruments. While most ranges fell within 80–120%, the most stringent range reported was 85–105% (We also noted that 80–120% is used for acceptability of ion ratios for compound identification in gas chromatography–mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%