2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Analysis of Circulating Cell-Free DNA for Correlation with Lung Cancer Survival: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract: Our findings support the clinical validity of quantitative analysis of cfDNA for the prediction of lung cancer survival. Nevertheless, the establishment of a robust standardized method for determination of optimal cutoff thresholds is required to define the clinical relevance of cfDNA quantification for lung cancer management.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(210 reference statements)
0
33
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While cfDNA is more frequently thought of as a means for identifying therapeutically targetable driver and resistance mutations, we and others have also shown that measuring the amount of cfDNA in plasma can be prognostic (Cargnin et al., ; Thompson et al., ). This may be especially relevant for our cohort of heavily pretreated patients, for whom mutations were detected in 12 of 25 plasma samples, but cfDNA yield was quantifiable for all 25 patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While cfDNA is more frequently thought of as a means for identifying therapeutically targetable driver and resistance mutations, we and others have also shown that measuring the amount of cfDNA in plasma can be prognostic (Cargnin et al., ; Thompson et al., ). This may be especially relevant for our cohort of heavily pretreated patients, for whom mutations were detected in 12 of 25 plasma samples, but cfDNA yield was quantifiable for all 25 patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Cell-free DNA concentration, independent of the identification of specific mutations, has also been shown to have prognostic value (Cargnin, Canonico, Genazzani, & Terrazzino, 2017;Thompson et al, 2016), although this has not yet been measured in melanoma. Plasma cfDNA yields for patients with lung and breast cancer have been associated with a worse prognosis (Couraud et al, 2014;Dawson et al, 2013;Thompson et al, 2016), and changes in cfDNA levels can precede clinical and radiographic tumor regression or progression, thus allowing for real-time, non-invasive surveillance of tumor burden (Lipson et al, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, there has been an explosion of technologies for the quantification and analysis of both these markers from the non-invasive and highly accessible “liquid biopsies”, however there is still a lack of standardization [55,56,59]. Quantification and integrity index of cfDNA are still proved to be valid diagnostic and prognostic markers in human cancer [23,4347,60]. However, enormous improvement in sensitivity and specificity of downstream analysis has been achieved for example by next generation sequencing (NGS), digital droplet PCR (ddPCR), and beads, emulsion, amplification, magnetics (BEAMing) PCR for tumor association, mutational analysis, and patient monitoring [55,61].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A higher baseline cfDNA concentration correlated with a statistically significant increase in the risk of death (HR 1.76, P<0.001). They were not, however, able to reach consensus on a cfDNA concentration cutoff point that portends a higher risk of poor outcomes given the heterogeneity of tests and reference genes that were used to detect the ctDNA (38).…”
Section: Prognostic Value Of Ctdna Concentrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%