Quantitative analysis of a Māori and Pacific admission process on first-year health study

Abstract

BackgroundUniversities should provide flexible and inclusive selection and admission policies to increase equity in access and outcomes for indigenous and ethnic minority students. This study investigates an equity-targeted admissions process, involving a Multiple Mini Interview and objective testing, advising Māori and Pacific students on their best starting point for academic success towards a career in medicine, nursing, health sciences and pharmacy.MethodsAll Māori and Pacific Admission Scheme (MAPAS) interviewees enrolled in bridging/foundation or degree-level programmes at the University of Auckland were identified (2009 to 2012). Generalised linear regression models estimated the predicted effects of admission variables (e.g. MAPAS Maths Test; National Certificate in Educational Achievement (NCEA) Rank Score; Any 2 Sciences; Followed MAPAS Advice) on first year academic outcomes (i.e. Grade Point Average (GPA) and Passes All Courses) adjusting for MAPAS interview year, gender, ancestry and school decile.Results368 First Year Tertiary (bridging/foundation or degree-level) and 242 First Year Bachelor (degree-level only) students were investigated. NCEA Rank Score (estimate 0.26, CI: 0.18-0.34, p< 0.0001); MAPAS Advice Followed (1.26, CI: 0.18-1.34, p = 0.0002); Exposure to Any 2 Sciences (0.651, CI: 0.15-1.15, p = 0.012); and MAPAS Mathematics Test (0.14, CI: 0.02-0.26, p = 0.0186) variables were strongly associated with an increase in First Year Tertiary GPA. The odds of passing all courses in First Year Tertiary study was 5.4 times higher for students who Followed MAPAS Advice (CI: 2.35-12.39; p< 0.0001) and 2.3 times higher with Exposure to Any Two Sciences (CI: 1.15-4.60; p = 0.0186). First Year Bachelor students who Followed MAPAS Advice had an average GPA that was 1.1 points higher for all eight (CI: 0.45-1.73; p = 0.0009) and Core 4 courses (CI: 0.60-2.04; p = 0.0004).ConclusionsThe MAPAS admissions process was strongly associated with positive academic outcomes in the first year of tertiary study. Universities should invest in a comprehensive admissions process that includes alternative entry pathways for indigenous and ethnic minority applicants.

Lessons for achieving health equity comparing Aotearoa/New Zealand and the United States

“…98,99 Workforce development programs have significantly increased the number of Māori and Pacific peoples in medical schools in Aotearoa/NZ and provided support and training to facilitate student success. 100 Political and legal debates over affirmative action have slowed efforts to increase the numbers of underrepresented minority physicians in the U.S. 101…”

Systematic review of disparities in surgical care for Māori in New Zealand

“…The Royal Australasian College of Surgeons has established an Indigenous Health Committee to lead the development of a Māori Health Action Plan and advocate for key issues facing Indigenous peoples in Australasia including equity, health workforce development and cultural safety . Furthermore, Kaupapa Māori research (KMR) has evolved extensively within the health sector to inform policy with particular regards to increasing the Māori health workforce and improving health outcomes for Māori …”

Indigenous Student Matriculation into Medical School: Policy and Progress

“…Indigenous students are also more likely to live in rural settings where limits of distance, internet access, and financial resources can create further disadvantage (McMullen, 2013;Statistics Canada, 2010). Such issues are not unique to Canada (Acosta & Olsen, 2006;Curtis et al, 2015). Curtis and colleagues have reported on sources of disadvantage including secondary school preparation among Indigenous students in New Zealand and the potential of equity-based admissions processes (Curtis & Reid, 2013;Curtis, Wikaire, Stokes, & Reid, 2012).…”