2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.micron.2021.103121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative analysis methods for studying fenestrations in liver sinusoidal endothelial cells. A comparative study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We observed broadening of the distribution of the fenestrations’ sizes towards smaller values. The detection of fenestrations in the range of 50–90 nm was reported to be overburdened with the error arising from the quality of SEM images [ 28 ]. Here, however, we were able to clearly distinguish the second group of fenestrations < 100 nm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We observed broadening of the distribution of the fenestrations’ sizes towards smaller values. The detection of fenestrations in the range of 50–90 nm was reported to be overburdened with the error arising from the quality of SEM images [ 28 ]. Here, however, we were able to clearly distinguish the second group of fenestrations < 100 nm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also provide data acquired with structured illumination microscopy (SIM), a method with resolution better than those imposed by the diffraction limit of light, that would allow us to colocalize pMLC and ppMLC to sieve plates and fenestrations. The selected methodology and data analysis methods were carefully selected based on our recent reports [ 28 , 29 ]. We supported our data with the assessment of LSEC functions, by performing the following: a viability test (lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) assay), a mitochondrial activity test (resazurin assay), and an assessment of endocytic activity (FSA scavenging assay).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparison between the groups in a single report provides information about the alterations as the same microscopy method is applied. The methodological details enabling avoiding errors in imaging and data analysis were described: SEM (Wisse et al, 2010;Cogger et al, 2015;Szafranska et al, 2021), AFM (Zapotoczny et al, 2017a(Zapotoczny et al, , 2020Szafranska et al, 2021), SIM (Kong et al, 2021;Szafranska et al, 2021). Moreover, the comparative measurements using different microscopies were reported in the past showing good correlation between the methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fenestrations were quantified using an intensity-based threshold method similar to the semiautomatic method described in ref. 46 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%