2011
DOI: 10.1038/nbt.1893
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative analysis demonstrates most transcription factors require only simple models of specificity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
219
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 171 publications
(229 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
9
219
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, the authors invoked a model where TFs could use alternative modes of binding, each represented by independent PWMs, to explain the PBM data. We developed a nonlinear regression method, BEEML-PBM, to estimate PWM parameters from PBM data (Zhao and Stormo 2011). Using BEEML-PBM, we showed that, contrary to the conclusions of Badis et al (2009), the PWM model provides a good quantitative model of specificity for most of the TFs in their study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In fact, the authors invoked a model where TFs could use alternative modes of binding, each represented by independent PWMs, to explain the PBM data. We developed a nonlinear regression method, BEEML-PBM, to estimate PWM parameters from PBM data (Zhao and Stormo 2011). Using BEEML-PBM, we showed that, contrary to the conclusions of Badis et al (2009), the PWM model provides a good quantitative model of specificity for most of the TFs in their study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…All models were parameterized using the BEEML-PBM algorithm, which has been described in detail previously (Zhao and Stormo 2011). Briefly, BEEML-PBM employs nonlinear regression to obtain the parameters of the model, E !…”
Section: Parameterization Of Tf Specificity Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations