1991
DOI: 10.1038/ki.1991.94
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitation of glycolate in urine by ion-chromatography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, there has been a recent report of elevated urine glycolate as the result of GO deficiency, although this disorder appears to be an incidental finding without a clinical phenotype. 30 The range of glycolate:creatinine ratios in the control group in this dataset was similar to previously reported ranges by a variety of methods: 20-107 mol/mmol by GCMS, 12 13-80 and 13-90 mol/mmol by ion-chromatography, 29,31 22-125 mol/mmol by chromotropic acid 32 but was somewhat higher than the levels reported using GO (4-41 mol/mmol). 33 This suggests that the positive bias we found with respect to the GO method may be attributed to under-recovery of glycolate by GO.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, there has been a recent report of elevated urine glycolate as the result of GO deficiency, although this disorder appears to be an incidental finding without a clinical phenotype. 30 The range of glycolate:creatinine ratios in the control group in this dataset was similar to previously reported ranges by a variety of methods: 20-107 mol/mmol by GCMS, 12 13-80 and 13-90 mol/mmol by ion-chromatography, 29,31 22-125 mol/mmol by chromotropic acid 32 but was somewhat higher than the levels reported using GO (4-41 mol/mmol). 33 This suggests that the positive bias we found with respect to the GO method may be attributed to under-recovery of glycolate by GO.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…18 Another published GCMS method gave a mean of 239 mol/mmol (range 79-418) in seven PH1 cases, 12 and an ion-chromatographic method gave a mean of 318 mol/mmol (range 112-555) in six PH1 cases. 29 However, glycolate was not a completely sensitive marker for PH1 because not all patients had elevated levels; this corroborates earlier findings that up to a quarter of patients with proven PH1 have normal urine glycolate excretion. 5 The differential excretion in oxalate and glycolate may reflect inter-individual variation in the relative activities of LDH and GR for glyoxylate metabolism.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…There is now a choice of accurate and reproducible methods for the measurement of urinary oxalate; the enzyme kit methods are currently the most widely used [14]. Urinary glycolate, which is of some value in differentiating the many causes of hyperoxaluria, can also be reliably measured [63][64][65], but the assay is not widely available. Urinary glycolate, which is of some value in differentiating the many causes of hyperoxaluria, can also be reliably measured [63][64][65], but the assay is not widely available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The glycolate:creatinine ratios in PH1 patients and controls produced by our method were similar to those previously reported. [10][11][12] Glycolate was not a completely sensitive nor specific marker for PH1 since not all PH1 patients had elevated levels -a finding that has been previously documented. 7 This situation possibly reflects inter-individual variation of enzymes including glycolate oxidase, LDH and GR involved in endogenous glycolate and glyoxylate metabolism as well as a dietary contribution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%