1995
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)80772-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitation of cardiac output with velocity-encoded, phase-difference magnetic resonance imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
68
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
68
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Its usefulness in estimating the cardiac output has been confirmed by various techniques in both experimental and clinical studies, showing good performance [13][14][15][16] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its usefulness in estimating the cardiac output has been confirmed by various techniques in both experimental and clinical studies, showing good performance [13][14][15][16] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Velocity information was acquired over one or two heart cycles (acquisition time of 3-7 min). Accuracy and precision of this technique has been thoroughly validated (2,16,26). Figure 2 shows an example of the velocity mapping technique in an image plane perpendicular to the inferior caval vein.…”
Section: Magnetic Resonance Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study conducted in swine, Kuehne et al attempted to compare the results of cardiac output measurements obtained using the thermodilution method to those obtained using VEC-MRI. 14, 15 However, to date, there are still few reports on studies of children. In the present study, a comparison of cardiac output (Qs) measured using the thermodilution method with that measured using VEC-MRI showed a good correlation ( Figure 2C).…”
Section: Part 1 Study: Children Without Shunt Lesionsmentioning
confidence: 99%