1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0944-5013(97)80027-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitation by enzyme immunoassay of spirosin from Lactobacillus reuteri and Escherichia coli

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1, the reactivity with the MAb (i.e., spirosin) was eluted at 0.18 M KCl and ADH activity at 0.26 M. The two peaks were clearly distinct from each other. Together with the previous findings that three strains of L. reuteri (DSM 20015, 20016 and 20053) exhibited significantly different levels of ADH activity whereas they produced almost the same amounts of spirosin (Yamato et al, 1997), the chromatographic results demonstrated that the spirosin of L. reuteri was not ADH at all. In addition, another protein which had the same molecular weight of 95 kDa and therefore superimposed on spirosin on SDS-PAGE (Fig.…”
supporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1, the reactivity with the MAb (i.e., spirosin) was eluted at 0.18 M KCl and ADH activity at 0.26 M. The two peaks were clearly distinct from each other. Together with the previous findings that three strains of L. reuteri (DSM 20015, 20016 and 20053) exhibited significantly different levels of ADH activity whereas they produced almost the same amounts of spirosin (Yamato et al, 1997), the chromatographic results demonstrated that the spirosin of L. reuteri was not ADH at all. In addition, another protein which had the same molecular weight of 95 kDa and therefore superimposed on spirosin on SDS-PAGE (Fig.…”
supporting
confidence: 77%
“…Affinity chromatography by use of the MAb was not successful either. Spirosin did not bind to the antibody ligand presumably because it might have a polymeric structure in a solution, and therefore its antigenic determinant might be buried as suggested previously (Yamato et al, 1997). It was finally obtained by a preparative SDS-PAGE as described in a previous paper (Yamato et al, 1994).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%