1982
DOI: 10.1017/s0022172400070170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitation and analysis of the specificity of post-immunization antibodies to influenza B viruses using single radial haemolysis

Abstract: SUMMARYThe single radial haemolysis (SRH)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0
2

Year Published

1983
1983
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For influenza B viruses the HI test is an unreliable indicator of immunity, and is oflow sensitivity (La Montagne, 1980;Wright, Bryant & Karzon, 1980), and SRH appears superior for the measurement of antibodies to this virus (Chakraverty, 1980;Oxford, Yetts & Schild, 1982;Goodeve, Jennings & Potter, 1983;Mancini et al 1983). For these reasons, SRH should replace the conventional HI test for routine laboratory measurement of such antibodies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For influenza B viruses the HI test is an unreliable indicator of immunity, and is oflow sensitivity (La Montagne, 1980;Wright, Bryant & Karzon, 1980), and SRH appears superior for the measurement of antibodies to this virus (Chakraverty, 1980;Oxford, Yetts & Schild, 1982;Goodeve, Jennings & Potter, 1983;Mancini et al 1983). For these reasons, SRH should replace the conventional HI test for routine laboratory measurement of such antibodies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Essentially the gels for haemolysis were prepared using the methods of Oxford, Yetts & Schild (1982), except that veronal buffered saline (VBS) was used as diluent throughout (Kurtz et al 1980). Sheep erythrocytes were sensitized using 30000 haemagglutinating units (HAU) of A/USSR/77, or 20000 HAU of WRL 105 per ml of erythrocytes.…”
Section: Serum Pair8mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This finding may not indicate that less serum HI antibody is necessary for protection against influenza B virus infection, but rather that the HI test is less sensitive in detecting HI antibody to influenza B viruses than to influenza A. This explanation is supported by the lower serum HI antibody responses seen following immunization, and the relative insensitivity of the HI test compared to the single radial haemolysis test in detecting antibody to influenza B virus, which is not seen for antibody to influenza A viruses (Oxford, Yetts & Schild, 1982). In addition, this would explain the finding of some studies that serum HI antibody titres are a poor indicaton ofimmunity to influenza B infection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%