2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantile regression methods for recursive structural equation models

Abstract: Abstract. Two classes of quantile regression estimation methods for the recursive structural equation models of Chesher (2003) are investigated. A class of weighted average derivative estimators based directly on the identification strategy of Chesher is contrasted with a new control variate estimation method. The latter imposes stronger restrictions achieving an asymptotic efficiency bound with respect to the former class. An application of the methods to the study of the effect of class size on the performan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, their estimator is hard to implement for computational reasons, since we have a model with four endogenous variables. We therefore choose the estimator proposed by Ma and Koenker () that relies on a recursive structural model . We therefore need to impose a more restrictive structure on the errors in Equations (3 and 5) and consider the wage earnings equation in terms of a linear location‐scale model (Koenker, , p. 17; Ma & Koenker, ).…”
Section: Empirical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, their estimator is hard to implement for computational reasons, since we have a model with four endogenous variables. We therefore choose the estimator proposed by Ma and Koenker () that relies on a recursive structural model . We therefore need to impose a more restrictive structure on the errors in Equations (3 and 5) and consider the wage earnings equation in terms of a linear location‐scale model (Koenker, , p. 17; Ma & Koenker, ).…”
Section: Empirical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain instrumental variables estimates of the functions for the conditional quantiles we reformulate Equations (3 and 5) as lnwitalicit=α0t+p=14αplnEpit+k=1KγkXkit+r=2RρrDitalicrit+ε4itp=14normallnEitalicpit+p=14lnEpitωpε5italicpitand italiclnEitalicpit=θp0t+p=14true[θp1normallntrue(nonsteep areapittrue)+θp2true(waterpittrue)true]+k=1KμpkXkit+r=2RδrDitalicrit++ε5pit,respectively. Ma and Koenker (, p. 4) suggest that we should think of this estimation framework in terms of a thought experiment where we do not manipulate the value of the treatment (in our case the economic mass in each distance band) but instead the entire distribution of the treatment variable. Thus, when assessing the effect on the distribution of the outcome (in our case wage earnings) we isolate the effect at various percentiles of the treatment distribution.…”
Section: Empirical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 For the case in which Y 1 is continuous, see Koenker and Bassett (1978), Koenker and d'Orey (1987), and Ma and Koenker (2004) for parametric estimation; see Chaudhuri, Doksum, and Samarov (1997), Kahn (2001), and Lee (2003Lee ( , 2004 for semiparametric estimation; and see Chaudhuri (1991) for nonparametric estimation. Machado and Santos Silva (2005) propose a procedure for the parametric case when Y 1 is discrete.…”
Section: Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chesher (2002) considered identification under index restrictions with multiple disturbances. Ma and Koenker (2006) considered identification and estimation of parametric nonseparable quantile effects using a parametric, quantile based control variable. Our triangular model results require that the endogenous variable be continuously distributed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%