2009
DOI: 10.1080/02664760902914508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantile dispersion graphs to compare the efficiencies of cluster randomized designs

Abstract: The purpose of this article is to compare efficiencies of several cluster randomized designs using the method of quantile dispersion graphs (QDGs). A cluster randomized design is considered whenever subjects are randomized at a group level but analyzed at the individual level. A prior knowledge of the correlation existing between subjects within the same cluster is necessary to design these cluster randomized trials. Using the QDG approach, we are able to compare several cluster randomized designs without requ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This occurred in a trial of mental illness because the outcome measure was a newly adaptive questionnaire with unknown properties. 48 In these situations, several approaches might be considered: an educated estimate could be gained from assessment of published ICCs and known patterns in their behaviour for different outcome types and clusters; graphical methods that compare competing designs without requiring knowledge of the ICC 49 ; or an internal pilot could be considered (see later section).…”
Section: Results: Sample Size Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This occurred in a trial of mental illness because the outcome measure was a newly adaptive questionnaire with unknown properties. 48 In these situations, several approaches might be considered: an educated estimate could be gained from assessment of published ICCs and known patterns in their behaviour for different outcome types and clusters; graphical methods that compare competing designs without requiring knowledge of the ICC 49 ; or an internal pilot could be considered (see later section).…”
Section: Results: Sample Size Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%