2017
DOI: 10.3390/s17030466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying Variation in Gait Features from Wearable Inertial Sensors Using Mixed Effects Models

Abstract: The emerging technology of wearable inertial sensors has shown its advantages in collecting continuous longitudinal gait data outside laboratories. This freedom also presents challenges in collecting high-fidelity gait data. In the free-living environment, without constant supervision from researchers, sensor-based gait features are susceptible to variation from confounding factors such as gait speed and mounting uncertainty, which are challenging to control or estimate. This paper is one of the first attempts… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This solution allows researchers to better identify activity or events. Relative to human walking, using these systems, it is possible to monitor events as the fall of a subject, or also to track in real time the trajectory of anatomical segments in total body configuration and to estimate the kinematic parameters of the gait cycle [8][9][10][11][12][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. The system could be very useful for patients, caregivers, and even for clinicians to support their clinical decision, as long as it is: (a) a user-friendly system; (b) suitable to be used outdoors, in real life, and not only in the laboratory; (c) capable of monitoring the subject in natural conditions for a long period of time, without altering the natural and normal execution of movements and activities; and (d) without a very complicated calibration process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This solution allows researchers to better identify activity or events. Relative to human walking, using these systems, it is possible to monitor events as the fall of a subject, or also to track in real time the trajectory of anatomical segments in total body configuration and to estimate the kinematic parameters of the gait cycle [8][9][10][11][12][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. The system could be very useful for patients, caregivers, and even for clinicians to support their clinical decision, as long as it is: (a) a user-friendly system; (b) suitable to be used outdoors, in real life, and not only in the laboratory; (c) capable of monitoring the subject in natural conditions for a long period of time, without altering the natural and normal execution of movements and activities; and (d) without a very complicated calibration process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No specific standard protocols were found in the literature, specifically dedicated to single trunk IMU systems for GA gold standard reference validation. Several studies have been carried out to assess the gait analysis reliability with wearable sensors [8][9][10][11][12][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22], but the evaluation protocols have not been homogeneous; they are mostly based on recording gait trials in a controlled setup to produce some reference datasets. These datasets have then been used to validate the methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike other gait parameters, which are calculated via sensor data from unilateral lower-limb movements, the temporal and spatial parameters of bilateral lower-limb movements are included in G s . A higher G s score indicates a more symmetrical gait [36,37], while a lower G s score indicates that the gait quality of the patient is still poor and more rehabilitation treatment is needed. Hemiplegia, caused by nervous system diseases such as strokes, is common in clinical practice, causing paralysis of one side of the body and asymmetrical gait.…”
Section: • Gait Symmetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such flexibility can cause variations in data capture which impacts the gait assessment quality. This is one of the major challenges for self-administration of wearable sensors by users in an out-of-lab environment without any supervision [29]. In [29], a framework is proposed for quantifying the variations resulting from using wearable sensors for data capture in a free-living environment.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is one of the major challenges for self-administration of wearable sensors by users in an out-of-lab environment without any supervision [29]. In [29], a framework is proposed for quantifying the variations resulting from using wearable sensors for data capture in a free-living environment. Even though there are many factors that affect data capture by wearable sensors, they consider the four more important sources of variations including mounting location, mounting leg, sensors, and speed.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%