Quantifying Uncertainty in Production Forecast for Fields With Significant History: A West African Case Study

Abstract

TX 75083-3836, U.S.A., fax 01-972-952-9435. AbstractUnderstanding the impact of subsurface uncertainties on production responses is an integral part of the decision making process. A more accurate quantification of the uncertainty band around production forecasts contributes to better business decisions. Traditional experimental design workflows, where a limited set of models represent the key uncertainties in subsurface parameters, might be well suited for new field developments. However, when a field has been produced for several years, all models have to be conditioned to available production data in order to obtain meaningful predictions. Data integration and uncertainty assessment of future performance of the reservoir are indivisible processes that cannot be generally addressed by simple techniques.In this paper we present a method to tackle such complex inverse problems where highly non-linear responses are involved. The goal is to minimize an objective function that stands for the goodness-of-fit of the history-match. The key idea is to use high quality proxies of the objective function to accelerate the search for solutions. An efficient experimental design stage allow for the selection of key parameters while an optimization routine involving Genetic Algorithms (GA) is used to determine the best combinations of parameters. The models that reasonably honor the historical data are selected and provide an estimate of future production. The final distribution of the prediction variables defines the range of uncertainty conditioned to production history. The practicality of the methodology is demonstrated with a study of an offshore field in West Africa that has several years of complex production history.

Modern Approach to Estimation of Uncertainty of Predictions With Dynamic Reservoir Simulation - A Case Study of a German Rotliegend Gasfield

“…76% of reserves. 'White' wells (1,2,4,8,10) show contributions of 23%, whilst 'grey' wells (3,7,9) will contribute only around 1%.…”

Application of Genetic Algorithm (GA) in History Matching of the Vapour Extraction (VAPEX) Heavy Oil Recovery Process

“…In general, these algorithms can be categorized into two groups: (1) gradient-based methods such as the Gaussian-Newton method (Thomas et al 1972) and the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm (Reynolds et al 2004); and (2) gradient-free methods including GAs (Castellini et al 2005) and simulated annealing (SA) algorithms (Sultan et al 1994). In order to obtain the gradient search direction, the gradient of the objective function is required, and it can be obtained by using an adjoint equation (Li et al 2001) or by computation of the sensitivity coefficient (Tan and Kalogerakis 1992).…”

A hybrid differential evolution algorithm approach towards assisted history matching and uncertainty quantification for reservoir models

“…Gradients based methods showed less performance in history matching because of their tendency to get trapped in local minima. In stochastic methods, many authors have tried different algorithms like simulated annealing (SA) (Sultan et al, 1994), neighbourhood algorithm (NA) (Subbey et al, 2003), genetic algorithms (GA) (Castellini et al, 2005;Sangwai et al, 2007), scatter search (SS) (Sousa et al, 2006;Erbas and Christie, 2007), Markov chain Monte Carlo (McMC) (Maucec et al, 2007), particle swarm optimization (PSO) (Mohamed et al, 2009), ant colony optimization (Hajizadeh et al, 2011), differential evolution (DE) (Hajizadeh et al, 2010). It is observed that the differential evolution algorithm has shown good results for the history matching but the performance of the algorithm was very much sensitive to the value of control parameters such as crossover rate.…”