2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying Traces of Tool Use: A Novel Morphometric Analysis of Damage Patterns on Percussive Tools

Abstract: Percussive technology continues to play an increasingly important role in understanding the evolution of tool use. Comparing the archaeological record with extractive foraging behaviors in nonhuman primates has focused on percussive implements as a key to investigating the origins of lithic technology. Despite this, archaeological approaches towards percussive tools have been obscured by a lack of standardized methodologies. Central to this issue have been the use of qualitative, non-diagnostic techniques to i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
65
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
65
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our approach to the use-wear assessment was similar to previous studies that have pioneered the use of GIS analysis of both archaeological and primate percussive tools, focusing on hammerstones [34] and stone anvils [35,36] (figure 2a). After visually assessing pits on three-dimensional models of all hammerstones, we exported the models as 'Stereo Lithography (STL) files to Meshlab at a resolution of 0.127 mm, where we calculated total model volume and isolated and cropped the pitted surfaces.…”
Section: (B) Use-wear Intensitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our approach to the use-wear assessment was similar to previous studies that have pioneered the use of GIS analysis of both archaeological and primate percussive tools, focusing on hammerstones [34] and stone anvils [35,36] (figure 2a). After visually assessing pits on three-dimensional models of all hammerstones, we exported the models as 'Stereo Lithography (STL) files to Meshlab at a resolution of 0.127 mm, where we calculated total model volume and isolated and cropped the pitted surfaces.…”
Section: (B) Use-wear Intensitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last few years, several works (Benito-Calvo et al 2015;Caruana et al 2014) tested the specific potential of the combination of 3D scanning and GIS in the quantification of battering marks on percussive tools. In particular, such methods were used by Benito-Calvo and colleagues (Benito-Calvo et al 2015) in order to identify and compute the use-related damage on battered tools used by extent primates from Bossou (Guinea).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identification of archaeological pounding tools relies on recognition of conspicuous marks, such as large battered areas, impacts, or specific fracture types [13, 4346]. In places such as Olduvai Gorge, percussive processes were of greater importance than stone knapping in some assemblages, as indicated by the presence of a range of artefacts such as anvils, hammerstones, spheroids and subspheroids with battering marks and fractures linked to their use as percussive tools [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%