2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10530-014-0793-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying the top-down and bottom-up effects of a non-native grazer in freshwaters

Abstract: Quantifying the effects of grazing and nutrient remineralization by grazers on algal biomass and productivity is important to estimate the net effects of grazing species on ecosystem structure and function. These effects may be especially important in ecosystems threatened by the invasion of non-native grazing species, as grazers can regulate the quantity of algae through both top-down (grazing) and bottom-up (remineralization) processes. In this study, we coupled mesocosm and in situ experimental manipulation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
12
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Removal or addition of vertebrates has had obvious impacts on standing stocks of organic matter in other tropical streams, e.g., grazing tadpoles , grazing armored catfish (Capps et al 2015), or detritivorous fish Taylor 2004, Taylor et al 2006), but we noted no effects of guppy presence on biofilm biomass or chlorophyll a standing stock despite increased primary production in guppy reaches. Since guppies are omnivorous (Zandona et al 2011), they are also unlikely to exert top-down effects of the same magnitude as a predator.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Removal or addition of vertebrates has had obvious impacts on standing stocks of organic matter in other tropical streams, e.g., grazing tadpoles , grazing armored catfish (Capps et al 2015), or detritivorous fish Taylor 2004, Taylor et al 2006), but we noted no effects of guppy presence on biofilm biomass or chlorophyll a standing stock despite increased primary production in guppy reaches. Since guppies are omnivorous (Zandona et al 2011), they are also unlikely to exert top-down effects of the same magnitude as a predator.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…), grazing armored catfish (Capps et al. ), or detritivorous fish (Flecker and Taylor , Taylor et al. ), but we noted no effects of guppy presence on biofilm biomass or chlorophyll a standing stock despite increased primary production in guppy reaches.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…From a statistical standpoint, A. stamineus’ dietary shift from algal to invertebrate prey was best explained by differences in fish community structure (DC1 community , AIC Table S4). Studies elsewhere show that high densities of non‐native algivorous loricariids (e.g., Hypostomus and Ancistrus armored catfish; Figure a) and omnivorous poeciliids and cichlids (e.g., tilapia) fishes can compete with native species for algal resources in urban streams (e.g., Capps et al., ). The dominance of invasive species across all trophic levels in urban streams of Hawai'i (Figure a, c, Table S4) represents an unnatural appropriation of energy and nutrients that would otherwise have been accessible to native fishes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Loss of riparian vegetation could also diminish input of allochthonous detritus and terrestrial invertebrates (Richardson, Zhang, & Marczak, 2010). Moreover, invasion of low trophic level exotic species (e.g., snails, armored catfish, tilapia, carp) may accentuate competition for basal resources, including from species that are less vulnerable to predation (Capps, Ulseth, & Flecker, 2015;Vinson & Baker, 2008). Hence, urban stream syndrome may result in reduced basal resources available to support native grazers (Gido & Franssen, 2007;Kautza & Sullivan, 2016;Singer & Battin, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We examined the direct effects of loricariid grazing on algal biomass and stoichiometry. However, in other work in the Chacamax River, investigators have documented a strong positive effect of loricariid remineralization on algal biomass and GPP (Capps et al 2014). Therefore, the potential influence of loricariid remineralization on the patterns we documented should be recognized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%