2018
DOI: 10.1002/sim.7850
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying the regression to the mean effect in Poisson processes

Abstract: Regression to the mean (RTM) can occur whenever an extreme observation is selected from a population and a later observation is closer to the population mean. A consequence of this phenomenon is that natural variability can be mistaken as real change. Simple expressions are available to quantify RTM when the underlying distribution is bivariate normal. However, there are many real-world situations, which are better approximated as a Poisson process. Examples include the number of hard disk failures during a ye… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regression to normal glucose regulation (RNGR) was defined as HbA1c <5.5% in the final visit to avoid the regression to the mean bias, 16 frequently observed in single measurements such as fasting glucose and 2-hour glucose. Prediabetes maintenance was defined as having at least one of the prediabetes criteria in the last visit.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regression to normal glucose regulation (RNGR) was defined as HbA1c <5.5% in the final visit to avoid the regression to the mean bias, 16 frequently observed in single measurements such as fasting glucose and 2-hour glucose. Prediabetes maintenance was defined as having at least one of the prediabetes criteria in the last visit.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the definition of the total observed effect T ( y 0 , θ ) in Equation , Khan and Olivier derived expressions for T ( y 0 , θ ) under the assumption of the bivariate Poisson distribution of successive occurrences, given by T(y0,θ)=θ11F(y01|θ0+θ1)1F(y0|θ0+θ1)θ2, where y 0 is the cut‐off point and Ffalse(yfalse|λfalse)=t=0yeλλtfalse/t!. The related expressions for RTM and intervention effects are given by alignleftalign-1R(y0,θ)=θ1·P(y0|θ0+θ1)1F(y0|θ0+θ1),align-2 where P ( y | λ ) = e − λ λ y / y !…”
Section: Regression To the Mean For The Bivariate Normal And Poisson mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gardner and Heady and Davis derived a formula for calculating the expected RTM effect under an assumption of bivariate normality of the pre and post observations. Similarly, Khan and Olivier derived expressions for the RTM effect assuming the bivariate Poisson distribution for pre and post counts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%