2005
DOI: 10.2112/04-0280.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying the Rapid Evolution of a Nourishment Project with Video Imagery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This error value is acceptable, being of comparable magnitude to the excursion of the swash‐zone during calm days and corresponding to about 6 cm of vertical range for an average intertidal slope of 1:15. The estimated error is of the same order of magnitude (or even less) as those obtained in the use of the Argus system for shoreline detection (Elko et al , ; Plant et al , ; Ruggiero and List, ; Ruiz de Alegria‐Arzaburu and Masselink, ), although recent applications resulted in lower errors (0·5 m, Plant and Holman, ; 0·4 m, Siegle et al , ).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…This error value is acceptable, being of comparable magnitude to the excursion of the swash‐zone during calm days and corresponding to about 6 cm of vertical range for an average intertidal slope of 1:15. The estimated error is of the same order of magnitude (or even less) as those obtained in the use of the Argus system for shoreline detection (Elko et al , ; Plant et al , ; Ruggiero and List, ; Ruiz de Alegria‐Arzaburu and Masselink, ), although recent applications resulted in lower errors (0·5 m, Plant and Holman, ; 0·4 m, Siegle et al , ).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…A single station can monitor a region of~5 km, obtaining a resolution of~0.2 m and~20 m in cross-and along-shore directions, respectively [4]. The high spatial and temporal resolution has made ARGUS a valuable data source for detailed investigation of coastal processes (e.g., [5][6][7]). However, for monitoring coastal systems on wider spatial scales and/or in developing countries, these systems are relatively costly and limited in coverage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Argus [ Holman and Stanley , 2007] and other image‐based coastal monitoring systems are now widespread around the world's coastlines, covering a broad parameter space in terms of wave climates, sedimentology and tidal range. Increasingly, video remote sensing is being used for practical coastal zone management applications [e.g., Elko et al , 2005; Turner et al , 2006; Davidson et al , 2007; Medina et al , 2007; Kroon et al , 2007; Jiménez et al , 2007; Van Koningsveld et al , 2007; Turner and Anderson , 2007] and more recently the calibration of nearshore models. For example, Smit et al [2007] investigated how video‐derived data sets of shoreline change, which are typically recorded at much higher frequency (daily or even hourly) than traditional surveys, might be used in conjunction with nonlinear methodologies to forecast daily to monthly shoreline behavior with a greater degree of accuracy than simple linear methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%