2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-23260-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying the propagation of distress and mental disorders in social networks

Abstract: Heterogeneity of human beings leads to think and react differently to social phenomena. Awareness and homophily drive people to weigh interactions in social multiplex networks, influencing a potential contagion effect. To quantify the impact of heterogeneity on spreading dynamics, we propose a model of coevolution of social contagion and awareness, through the introduction of statistical estimators, in a weighted multiplex network. Multiplexity of networked individuals may trigger propagation enough to produce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
37
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This fact, according to authors such as Scatà and collaborators [44] can prove that said tendency plays a double role in contraction, with this being reinforcing or delaying the noxious ideas that can lead to unhealthy behaviours such as suicide. In addition, these values are justified because the majority of the students belong to different geographic areas [45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This fact, according to authors such as Scatà and collaborators [44] can prove that said tendency plays a double role in contraction, with this being reinforcing or delaying the noxious ideas that can lead to unhealthy behaviours such as suicide. In addition, these values are justified because the majority of the students belong to different geographic areas [45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vast majority (90%) of introduced models were designed to work only on simple two layers networks. The only model designed for three layers networks was introduced in [63].…”
Section: ) Number Of Layersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are quite few papers [ [63] are using three layers networks while the rest of them is limited to two layers networks (for details see Table 7). Extending the number of layers in the experiments builds the complexity but at the same time is a must-have to fully understand the mechanisms behind multispread over multilayer networks.…”
Section: ) Number Of Layersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, we shed light on that awareness measure has not change according to the layers, since awareness once acquired is the same in the different layers in which a user is involved. It can be influenced by the fading of interests on acquiring additional and correlated awareness, or verifying if it is fact-checked or misinformation based [17], [63]. The awareness gap between two interacting nodes in M 1 , impacts on the weights of links as detailed in section III-B1, in conjunction with the homophily value h ij .…”
Section: ) Abstract-basedmentioning
confidence: 99%