2005
DOI: 10.1109/tpds.2005.61
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying the performability of cluster-based services

Abstract: Abstract-In this paper, we propose a two-phase methodology for systematically evaluating the performability (performance and availability) of cluster-based Internet services. In the first phase, evaluators use a fault-injection infrastructure to characterize the service's behavior in the presence of faults. In the second phase, evaluators use an analytical model to combine an expected fault load with measurements from the first phase to assess the service's performability. Using this model, evaluators can stud… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…performance, availability, performability [12], as the system evolves. In particular, common changes that are made to services over their lifetimes, such as increasing the amount of memory per node, adding new nodes, or replacing a pair of expensive database systems (a primary and a hot backup) with multiple cheaper computers, may cause the current configuration settings to behave poorly with respect to the metric.…”
Section: Tuning Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…performance, availability, performability [12], as the system evolves. In particular, common changes that are made to services over their lifetimes, such as increasing the amount of memory per node, adding new nodes, or replacing a pair of expensive database systems (a primary and a hot backup) with multiple cheaper computers, may cause the current configuration settings to behave poorly with respect to the metric.…”
Section: Tuning Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This rating mechanism entirely decoupled the credibility assessment of the evaluations from the ranking itself, which makes it very robust against collusion attacks as well as random and biased raters. A twophase methodology was proposed in [15] for systematically evaluating the performance and availability of cluster-based Internet services. A service rating scheme that is robust against manipulations by malicious users and services was proposed in [16].…”
Section: A Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An effective approach in facing dynamicity and evolution consists in combining modeling and experimentation (e.g., [11], [14]). We advocate the need of a dynamic model generation (and evaluation) process, capable to dynamically produce at run-time different models representing the current system state and conditions, and capable to feed the models' parameters with values coming from monitoring and experimental evaluation activities.…”
Section: Assessment Of Mobile Dynamic Evolutionary Sossmentioning
confidence: 99%