2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.08.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying the outcome of surgical treatment of temporomandibular joint ankylosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The recommended results after surgical treatment of TMJa in terms of postoperative mouth opening range between 30 mm and 35 mm (De Roo et al, 2016), which is in line with the results of our study. Different surgical procedures have been described to correct TMJ ankyloses; however, there is no agreement regarding the ideal technique.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The recommended results after surgical treatment of TMJa in terms of postoperative mouth opening range between 30 mm and 35 mm (De Roo et al, 2016), which is in line with the results of our study. Different surgical procedures have been described to correct TMJ ankyloses; however, there is no agreement regarding the ideal technique.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…PAT has been found to be potential pathway for the spread of pathological processes and infection. Otitis media or mastoiditis may involve the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and ankylosis could be occurred as a result of this (7,(15)(16)(17). Additionally, we must keep in mind that fractures of the base of the skull may extend through the PAT and this could be destructive for glenoid fossa (18).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intraoperative hemostasis is a serious challenge due to the limited operative space and exposure. To protect the blood vessels and nerves, an extended incision, wide exposure of the ankylotic mass, aggressive retraction, sacrifice of soft tissue, and a protective shield are often required in conventional arthroplasty, which may lead to a prolonged operation duration, postoperative swelling, pain, and scar 21 . A major advantage of ultrasonic surgery is the precise and selective cutting for mineralized structures, thus sparing soft tissue and significantly reducing blood loss 22 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%