2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaac.2018.09.431
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying the Optimal Structure of the Autism Phenotype: A Comprehensive Comparison of Dimensional, Categorical, and Hybrid Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results support the argument of Happé et al (2006) that the different dimensions of autistic traits should be studied separately (due to potentially independent causal factors) rather than combined into a single unitary factor. Our results also agree with findings by Kim et al (2018) that the ASD phenotype is most optimally characterized by three separate domains rather than as a single categorical syndrome. Had the BAPQ subscales not been analyzed individually in the present study, the dominance of aloofness over rigidity or pragmatic language problems in relation to mental well-being may not have been identified.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These results support the argument of Happé et al (2006) that the different dimensions of autistic traits should be studied separately (due to potentially independent causal factors) rather than combined into a single unitary factor. Our results also agree with findings by Kim et al (2018) that the ASD phenotype is most optimally characterized by three separate domains rather than as a single categorical syndrome. Had the BAPQ subscales not been analyzed individually in the present study, the dominance of aloofness over rigidity or pragmatic language problems in relation to mental well-being may not have been identified.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Although exploring the specific phenotypic heterogeneity present in the social–emotional skill profiles of individuals with ASD (Kim et al, ) is outside the scope of this initial pilot study, informal analyses did reveal several distinct patterns of ability without demonstrating the sort of floor effects, or range restriction, often seen in other measures that are also usable in non‐ASD populations. For example, some domain scores within individuals varied by more than two SDs from each other—with strengths in certain domains and challenges in others.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Given these findings, and those of increased loneliness in autism, one potential explanation for the individual differences in anthropomorphism observed across the wider population, may be autistic traits. Autism may present one extreme of a continuous distribution (or multiple distributions) of differences in social and cognitive styles or traits (see Kamp-Becker et al, 2010;Kim et al, 2019 for a discussion of the debate regarding categorical and dimensional approaches to autism). The 'broader autism phenotype' account suggests that these traits may extend to non-autistic relatives and the broader 'neurotypical' population (Baron-Cohen, Wheelwright, Skinner, Martin, & Clubley, 2001;Landry & Chouinard, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%