“…This allows an affinity determination of a protein–ligand interaction by observing fluorescence changes. ,, Besides thermophoresis, other effects can cause these changes, e.g., temperature differences and changes in the local environment of the fluorophore. , The advantages of this method are certainly its sensitivity and scalability, but also the fact that screenings can be performed directly with cell lysates or blood sera, which makes it a powerful method for drug discovery. ,,,− Determining binding affinity by MST, however, comes with some inherent problems. In most cases, the protein of interest must be fluorescently labeled, either in a covalent manner, by thiol or amide coupling, or in a non-covalent manner, by His-tag labeling with a fluorescent dye. , Direct measuring of protein–ligand interactions by MST only shows binding events but cannot reveal if the detected binding is competitive with respect to the active site of the protein, or if the ligand binding occurs on an allosteric site. It can also be very challenging to reach saturation conditions for the bound protein–ligand complex, especially if ligands only have binding affinities in the low single-digit micromolar range like the currently known inhibitors of DNMT2.…”