2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.apor.2020.102196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying the influence of pile diameter on the load transfer curves of laterally loaded monopile in sand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
4
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different or even "wrong" p-y models can still give reasonable prediction of the bending moment profiles. The same observation was also reported by Wang et al [18].…”
Section: Parametric Study Of Lateral Response Of Rigid Piles In Sand 41 Influence Of Pile Diameter and Aspect Ratiosupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Different or even "wrong" p-y models can still give reasonable prediction of the bending moment profiles. The same observation was also reported by Wang et al [18].…”
Section: Parametric Study Of Lateral Response Of Rigid Piles In Sand 41 Influence Of Pile Diameter and Aspect Ratiosupporting
confidence: 89%
“…As shown in the figure, both the API and PISA p-y models significantly overestimated the pile response. The overestimation of the API model is also reported in Wang et al [18]. However, it is interesting to see that while the p-y models in API and PISA are defined differently, the predicted pile loaddeflection response is very similar.…”
Section: Validation Of the Fe Modelsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The failure loads of D = 30 mm were 23.52, 30.87, and 35.28 N, respectively, which are 45.4 , 43.2 , and 44 higher than those of D = 20 mm Consistent with the literature 31 . Wang et al 32 concluded that as the pile diameter increases, when the pile fails, the soil will change from a shallow wedge failure to a combination of shallow wedge failure and deep rotating soil flow. Therefore, the anchor pile uplift resistance capacity will not increase with the increase in pile diameter by an equal margin.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The failure loads of D = 30 mm were 23.52, 30.87, and 35.28 N, respectively, which are 45.4%, 43.2%, and 44% higher than those of D = 20 mm. Wang et al 31 concluded that as the pile diameter increases, when the pile fails, the soil will change from a shallow wedge failure to a combination of shallow wedge failure and deep rotating soil flow; therefore, the anchor pile uplift resistance capacity will not increase with the in-crease in pile diameter by an equal margin. Although the number of pile diameter sam-ples in this experiment was not sufficient, the improvement in the failure load of D = 30 mm compared to D = 20 mm was significantly smaller than that of D = 20 mm compared to D = 10 mm.…”
Section: Effect Of Pile Diameter On Uplift Resistance Capacitymentioning
confidence: 99%