Abstract:This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
“…For instance, the temporal inertia in the establishment of genetic differentiation after barrier creation makes it particularly difficult to compare the impact of obstacles differing in age or in the effective size of the populations they separate. We developed a standardized index of genetic connectivity ( C INDEX ), allowing an absolute and independent assessment of the individual effects of obstacles on connectivity (Prunier et al, 2019). We demonstrated that the C INDEX , based on the comparison between observed and expected measures of genetic differentiation, allows quantifying genetic effects of fragmentation a few generations (~10 generations) after barrier creation, while allowing valid comparisons among species and obstacles of different ages.…”
Section: The Impacts Of Human Activities On Intraspecific Diversity Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To warrant effective management prioritization and proper evaluation of restoration measures, it is crucial that environmental managers have access to precise and robust estimates of the individual impact of weirs and dams on functional connectivity. By introducing the C INDEX (Prunier et al, 2019), we aimed to tackle a number of technical issues stemming from the indirect quantification of barrier effects from genetic data, although we readily acknowledge that further developments are still needed to make it a fully operational tool. We notably plan to take into account the role of asymmetric gene flow (Paz‐Vinas et al, 2015) and to improve both spatial and temporal resolutions of the C INDEX by considering the use of genomic and epigenetic markers (Rey et al, 2020).…”
Section: The Impacts Of Human Activities On Intraspecific Diversity Imentioning
Rivers are fascinating ecosystems in which the eco‐evolutionary dynamics of organisms are constrained by particular features, and biologists have developed a wealth of knowledge about freshwater biodiversity patterns. Over the last 10 years, our group used a holistic approach to contribute to this knowledge by focusing on the causes and consequences of intraspecific diversity in rivers. We conducted empirical works on temperate permanent rivers from southern France, and we broadened the scope of our findings using experiments, meta‐analyses, and simulations. We demonstrated that intraspecific (genetic) diversity follows a spatial pattern (downstream increase in diversity) that is repeatable across taxa (from plants to vertebrates) and river systems. This pattern can result from interactive processes that we teased apart using appropriate simulation approaches. We further experimentally showed that intraspecific diversity matters for the functioning of river ecosystems. It indeed affects not only community dynamics, but also key ecosystem functions such as litter degradation. This means that losing intraspecific diversity in rivers can yield major ecological effects. Our work on the impact of multiple human stressors on intraspecific diversity revealed that—in the studied river systems—stocking of domestic (fish) strains strongly and consistently alters natural spatial patterns of diversity. It also highlighted the need for specific analytical tools to tease apart spurious from actual relationships in the wild. Finally, we developed original conservation strategies at the basin scale based on the systematic conservation planning framework that appeared pertinent for preserving intraspecific diversity in rivers. We identified several important research avenues that should further facilitate our understanding of patterns of local adaptation in rivers, the identification of processes sustaining intraspecific biodiversity–ecosystem function relationships, and the setting of reliable conservation plans.
“…For instance, the temporal inertia in the establishment of genetic differentiation after barrier creation makes it particularly difficult to compare the impact of obstacles differing in age or in the effective size of the populations they separate. We developed a standardized index of genetic connectivity ( C INDEX ), allowing an absolute and independent assessment of the individual effects of obstacles on connectivity (Prunier et al, 2019). We demonstrated that the C INDEX , based on the comparison between observed and expected measures of genetic differentiation, allows quantifying genetic effects of fragmentation a few generations (~10 generations) after barrier creation, while allowing valid comparisons among species and obstacles of different ages.…”
Section: The Impacts Of Human Activities On Intraspecific Diversity Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To warrant effective management prioritization and proper evaluation of restoration measures, it is crucial that environmental managers have access to precise and robust estimates of the individual impact of weirs and dams on functional connectivity. By introducing the C INDEX (Prunier et al, 2019), we aimed to tackle a number of technical issues stemming from the indirect quantification of barrier effects from genetic data, although we readily acknowledge that further developments are still needed to make it a fully operational tool. We notably plan to take into account the role of asymmetric gene flow (Paz‐Vinas et al, 2015) and to improve both spatial and temporal resolutions of the C INDEX by considering the use of genomic and epigenetic markers (Rey et al, 2020).…”
Section: The Impacts Of Human Activities On Intraspecific Diversity Imentioning
Rivers are fascinating ecosystems in which the eco‐evolutionary dynamics of organisms are constrained by particular features, and biologists have developed a wealth of knowledge about freshwater biodiversity patterns. Over the last 10 years, our group used a holistic approach to contribute to this knowledge by focusing on the causes and consequences of intraspecific diversity in rivers. We conducted empirical works on temperate permanent rivers from southern France, and we broadened the scope of our findings using experiments, meta‐analyses, and simulations. We demonstrated that intraspecific (genetic) diversity follows a spatial pattern (downstream increase in diversity) that is repeatable across taxa (from plants to vertebrates) and river systems. This pattern can result from interactive processes that we teased apart using appropriate simulation approaches. We further experimentally showed that intraspecific diversity matters for the functioning of river ecosystems. It indeed affects not only community dynamics, but also key ecosystem functions such as litter degradation. This means that losing intraspecific diversity in rivers can yield major ecological effects. Our work on the impact of multiple human stressors on intraspecific diversity revealed that—in the studied river systems—stocking of domestic (fish) strains strongly and consistently alters natural spatial patterns of diversity. It also highlighted the need for specific analytical tools to tease apart spurious from actual relationships in the wild. Finally, we developed original conservation strategies at the basin scale based on the systematic conservation planning framework that appeared pertinent for preserving intraspecific diversity in rivers. We identified several important research avenues that should further facilitate our understanding of patterns of local adaptation in rivers, the identification of processes sustaining intraspecific biodiversity–ecosystem function relationships, and the setting of reliable conservation plans.
“…We preferred this metric of differentiation over other metrics (e.g., Fst, Gst, Jost’s D, etc.) as it has been shown to be robust to variations in mutation rates and sample sizes [ 58 , 59 ].…”
Epigenetic components are hypothesized to be sensitive to the environment, which should permit species to adapt to environmental changes. In wild populations, epigenetic variation should therefore be mainly driven by environmental variation. Here, we tested whether epigenetic variation (DNA methylation) observed in wild populations is related to their genetic background, and/or to the local environment. Focusing on two sympatric freshwater fish species (Gobio occitaniae and Phoxinus phoxinus), we tested the relationships between epigenetic differentiation, genetic differentiation (using microsatellite and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers), and environmental distances between sites. We identify positive relationships between pairwise genetic and epigenetic distances in both species. Moreover, epigenetic marks better discriminated populations than genetic markers, especially in G. occitaniae. In G. occitaniae, both pairwise epigenetic and genetic distances were significantly associated to environmental distances between sites. Nonetheless, when controlling for genetic differentiation, the link between epigenetic differentiation and environmental distances was not significant anymore, indicating a noncausal relationship. Our results suggest that fish epigenetic variation is mainly genetically determined and that the environment weakly contributed to epigenetic variation. We advocate the need to control for the genetic background of populations when inferring causal links between epigenetic variation and environmental heterogeneity in wild populations.
“…Sampling operations ‘Before’ and ‘After’ restoration were performed using electrofishing, until a maximum of 30 adult individuals of each species were captured on either side of obstacles. Fish were captured in the direct downstream and upstream vicinity of each obstacle (Prunier et al, 2020), starting from the downstream site to avoid accidental upstream to downstream movements of individuals. A piece of pelvic fin was sampled on all individuals and stored in 96% alcohol.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we implemented a “before-after genetic monitoring” of the restoration of 11 weirs in France using a recently developed genetic index of fragmentation (the F INDEX ; Prunier et al, 2020). The F INDEX provides, independently for each obstacle, an absolute and standardized estimate of (species-specific) genetic connectivity, while taking into account two confounding factors: the age of the obstacle and the size of populations on either side of the obstacle.…”
Rivers are heavily fragmented by man-made instream barriers such as dams and weirs. This hyper-fragmentation is a major threat to freshwater biodiversity and restoration policies are now adopted worldwide to mitigate these impacts. However, there is surprisingly little feedback on the efficiency of barrier mitigation measures in restoring riverine connectivity, notably for non-migratory fish species. Here, we implemented a "before-after genetic monitoring" of the restoration of 11 weirs in France using a dedicated genetic index of fragmentation (the FINDEX), with a focus on five fish species from two genera. We found that most obstacles actually had a significant impact on connectivity before restoration, especially the highest and steepest ones, with an overall barrier effect of about 51% of the maximal theoretical impact. Most importantly, we demonstrated for the first time that mitigation measures such as dam removal or fish pass creation significantly and rapidly improved connectivity, with -for some barriers- a complete recovery of the genetic connectivity in less than twelve months. Our study provides a unique and strong proof-of-concept that barrier removal is an efficient strategy to restore riverine connectivity and that molecular tools can provide accurate measures of restoration efficiency within a few months.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.