2022
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2187628/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Clinical Trial Enrollment Rates Over Time in 37 Countries

Abstract: The COVID-19 pandemic has had an unprecedented and disruptive impact on people’s health and lives worldwide. In addition to burdening people’s health in the short-term in the form of infection, illness, and mortality, there has been an enormous negative impact on clinical research. Clinical trials experienced challenges in ensuring patient safety and enrolling new patients throughout the pandemic. Here, we investigate and quantify the negative impact that the COVID-19 pandemic has industry-sponsored clinical t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, industry observers and participants shared concerns about the expected slowdown in clinical trial activity [1][2][3][4][5]. Using a range of methodologies from site surveys, to case studies, to on-line publication and citation reviews, individual analyses across a range of therapeutic areas and geographies reported initially slower enrollments [6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. However, throughout many of these reports, the clinical trial professionals also reported changes introduced to maintain study enrollment, keep both patients and employees safe, change the way they conducted clinical research and even how the people running the trials might analyze datasets with increasing amounts of missing data [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, industry observers and participants shared concerns about the expected slowdown in clinical trial activity [1][2][3][4][5]. Using a range of methodologies from site surveys, to case studies, to on-line publication and citation reviews, individual analyses across a range of therapeutic areas and geographies reported initially slower enrollments [6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. However, throughout many of these reports, the clinical trial professionals also reported changes introduced to maintain study enrollment, keep both patients and employees safe, change the way they conducted clinical research and even how the people running the trials might analyze datasets with increasing amounts of missing data [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%