2016
DOI: 10.3390/rs8010029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying the Impact of NDVIsoil Determination Methods and NDVIsoil Variability on the Estimation of Fractional Vegetation Cover in Northeast China

Abstract: Abstract:Fractional vegetation cover (FVC) is one of the most critical parameters in monitoring vegetation status. Accurate estimates of FVC are crucial to the use in land surface models. The dimidiate pixel model is the most widely used method for retrieval of FVC. The normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) of bare soil endmember (NDVI soil ) is usually assumed to be invariant without taking into account the spatial variability of soil backgrounds. Two NDVI soil determining methods were compared for es… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
40
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The tree cover estimated in this study also shows a strong correlation with a previous woody cover map by Bucini (Bucini et al 2009;Bucini et al 2010) (Figure 9). Although NDVI values have been reported as being suboptimal for FVC estimation (Jiang et al 2006), some methods that account for soil background contribution in the NDVI have shown good relationships with ground measurements (Moreno-de Las et al 2015;Ding et al 2016;Zeng et al 2000). However, signal contamination, soil background colour, and saturation problems limited the NDVI-FVC relationship (Verger et al 2009;Baumgardner et al 1986).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tree cover estimated in this study also shows a strong correlation with a previous woody cover map by Bucini (Bucini et al 2009;Bucini et al 2010) (Figure 9). Although NDVI values have been reported as being suboptimal for FVC estimation (Jiang et al 2006), some methods that account for soil background contribution in the NDVI have shown good relationships with ground measurements (Moreno-de Las et al 2015;Ding et al 2016;Zeng et al 2000). However, signal contamination, soil background colour, and saturation problems limited the NDVI-FVC relationship (Verger et al 2009;Baumgardner et al 1986).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, more remote sensing data from different sensors should be investigated in order to evaluate their performance on FVC estimation in a more complex environment. In addition, only NDVI and EVI were used in the pixel dimidiate model, and more vegetation indices could be used for FVC estimation, such as soil adjusted vegetation index (SAVI) and modified SAVI (MSAVI) [26,60,61]. Therefore, more FVC estimation methods using remote sensing data could be evaluated in future work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pixel dimidiate model is a simple and widely used method for FVC estimation using remote sensing data, which assumes that one pixel is only composed of either vegetation or non-vegetation, and the fraction of vegetation composition is considered to be the FVC of this pixel [22][23][24][25][26]. Usually, a vegetation index is used as an indicator in the pixel dimidiate model, and the key issue of the pixel dimidiate model is determining the values of the vegetation index for pure vegetation and pure soil pixels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Determining FVC from digital photographs is often simpler, faster and more economical than measuring LAI [1,15,17]. FVC values derived from ground and near-ground remotely sensed images for validation of FVC estimated from satellite images is vital in ensuring the quality of FVC estimates derived from satellite images [9,[21][22][23][24][25]. However, there are often significant problems with current FVC estimation methodologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applications include vegetation monitoring [8,9], estimation of LAI [10][11][12], plant nutritional status [6,7,13], fractional vegetation cover measurement [1,[14][15][16][17], growth characteristics [18], weed detection [19] and crop identification [20]. Determining FVC from digital photographs is often simpler, faster and more economical than measuring LAI [1,15,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%