2023
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stad152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying the global ‘CMB tension’ between the Atacama Cosmology Telescope and the Planck satellite in extended models of cosmology

Abstract: We study the global agreement between the most recent observations of the Cosmic Microwave Background temperature and polarization anisotropies angular power spectra released by the Atacama Cosmology Telescope and the Planck satellite in various cosmological models that differ by the inclusion of different combinations of additional parameters. By using the Suspiciousness statistic, we show that the global ”CMB tension” between the two experiments, quantified at the Gaussian equivalent level of ∼2.5 σ within t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
(50 reference statements)
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the 7-dimensional IDE model considered in this work, we find that the tension between ACT and Planck persists at a Gaussian equivalent level of 2.3σ (log S = −4.7, p = 0.0217, χ 2 = 16.4 ), similar to the baseline cosmological model [90,91]. Therefore, we conclude that IDE cosmologies do not provide a resolution to the discrepancies observed between the two CMB probes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the 7-dimensional IDE model considered in this work, we find that the tension between ACT and Planck persists at a Gaussian equivalent level of 2.3σ (log S = −4.7, p = 0.0217, χ 2 = 16.4 ), similar to the baseline cosmological model [90,91]. Therefore, we conclude that IDE cosmologies do not provide a resolution to the discrepancies observed between the two CMB probes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Notice that these values are very close to those obtained with ACT only data (see Table I) and that the most relevant effect when adding the prior on the Hubble constant is a decrease on its error, being the change on its mean value completely negligible and therefore making the hints for an IDE cosmology from high multipole data a neat result. We measure the level of agreement between Planck and ACT under the Interacting Dark Energy cosmology, adopting the Suspiciousness statistics [89][90][91]. This methodology provides a comprehensive overview of how these discrepancies evolve in extended parameter-spaces, without being influenced by biases resulting from prior volume effects.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The absence of detection of B-mode polarization in the cosmic microwave background [100], which would represent a smoking-gun evidence for inflation, offering valuable information on its underlying micro-physics, presents a major challenge. In addition, the emerging disagreements among independent CMB observations [101][102][103][104][105][106][107][108] often involve inflationary parameters [41,105,106], contributing to the ongoing uncertainty. Thus, with inflation, one of the important cornerstones of modern cosmology, we find ourselves between the known and unknown.…”
Section: Jcap09(2023)019mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite its remarkable success, inflation is not free from limitations. From an observational perspective, the absence of a definitive detection of B-mode polarization [8,9] and the emerging discrepancies among different Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) experiments [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] pose new challenges in determining precise predictions for the inflationary models/mechanisms that best explain observational data [19], and various studies suggest that modifications to the inflationary sector of the cosmological model might play a relevant role in addressing (part of) the tension between the value of the expansion rate of the Universe H 0 [20][21][22][23][24] measured through direct local distance ladder measurements and the value inferred from CMB observations, see e.g., [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. On the other hand, from a theoretical standpoint, despite a plethora of proposed models and mechanisms [35], the nature of the inflation field (or fields) remains still unknown and embedding inflation in a more fundamental theory remains an open problem [36][37][38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%