2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2020.103535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying the errors of the particle-source-in-cell Euler-Lagrange method

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To accurately compute the momentum transfer, the velocity difference between each particle and the local undisturbed velocity is required: this is defined as the fluid velocity at the particle, excluding the effects for the presence of that particle. When the particle is sufficiently small compared to the mesh spacing, as is outlined in the original ''particle-source-in-cell'' (PSIC) approach [63], the errors of neglecting this intricate difference in the definition of the velocity are small, but these can quickly increase in magnitude as the particle diameter to mesh spacing ratio exceeds 0.1 [64].…”
Section: Particle-fluid Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To accurately compute the momentum transfer, the velocity difference between each particle and the local undisturbed velocity is required: this is defined as the fluid velocity at the particle, excluding the effects for the presence of that particle. When the particle is sufficiently small compared to the mesh spacing, as is outlined in the original ''particle-source-in-cell'' (PSIC) approach [63], the errors of neglecting this intricate difference in the definition of the velocity are small, but these can quickly increase in magnitude as the particle diameter to mesh spacing ratio exceeds 0.1 [64].…”
Section: Particle-fluid Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the framework of the EL approach, it is recommended that bubble diameters be at least an order of magnitude smaller than the mesh spacing to ensure that the impulse between the bubble and the fluid is accurately transferred [33]. Interestingly, Sungkorn et al [18] suggested that minimal numerical mesh sizes double the bubble diameter were sufficient.…”
Section: Bubble Column Simulation In the Euler-euler Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1977), many alternative and more accurate approaches have been conceived – see, for instance, Garg et al. (2007), Horwitz & Mani (2016), Pakseresht, Esmaily & Apte (2020) and Evrard, Denner & van Wachem (2021) – in the context of Euler–Lagrangian simulations. Other authors filtered the fluid equations on the scale of the particle accounting for excluded volume effects, and the related subgrid stresses on the fluid (Capecelatro & Desjardins 2013; Ireland & Desjardins 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the limit of small particle Reynolds number, and dilute volume fractions, the particle-source in cell method (Crowe, Sharma & Stock 1977) has been the first approach designed to capture the interphase momentum exchange. Since (Crowe et al 1977), many alternative and more accurate approaches have been conceived -see, for instance, Garg et al (2007), Horwitz & Mani (2016), Pakseresht, Esmaily & Apte (2020) and Evrard, Denner & van Wachem (2021) -in the context of Euler-Lagrangian simulations. Other authors filtered the fluid equations on the scale of the particle accounting for excluded volume effects, and the related subgrid stresses on the fluid (Capecelatro & Desjardins 2013;Ireland & Desjardins 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%