Quantifying the environmental characteristics influencing the attractiveness of commercial agglomerations with big geo-data

Abstract

Understanding the attractiveness of commercial agglomerations contributes to urban planning. Existing studies focus less on commercial agglomerations, and most directly use environmental supply factors to characterize attractiveness. This study measures attractiveness from the perspective of human demand. Specifically, we build a novel bipartite graph based on big geo-data of human mobility, using node centralities (degree, betweenness, and pagerank) to measure attractiveness. Next, we summarize multisource environmental features such as Point-of-Interests (POIs), land cover, transportation, and population, and use them as inputs to accurately predict attractiveness based on random forest. Finally, the spatial heterogeneity of the effects of these environmental variables on attractiveness is analyzed by multiscale geographically weighted regression. The results of the Beijing case show that: (1) All three centralities show a trend that the urban center is higher than the surrounding area, and betweenness is more reasonable. (2) Random forest can accurately predict attractiveness, with R2 for degree, betweenness, and pagerank at 0.903, 0.846, and 0.760, respectively. (3) The number of shopping POIs, the length of main roads, and the number of bus stops positively affect attractiveness, while the effects of greening ratio and population density are bidirectional. As for the service scope, about 70% of commercial agglomerations have an average service radius of less than 15 km, which is significantly correlated with the Voronoi diagram. Our results can inspire understanding the human–environment relationship and guide urban policymakers in business planning.

Analysis of Spatiotemporal Changes in the Gravitational Structure of Urban Agglomerations in Northern and Southern Xinjiang Based on a Gravitational Model

“…There must be variations in each city's appeal or an asymmetry in the attractiveness across cities as a result of their varying levels of development [30]. As a result, cities are drawn to one another in both directions [31][32][33]. The degree to which a city attracts other nearby cities can be represented by its positive attraction, and the degree to which it accepts radiation from other nearby cities can be represented by its negative attraction.…”

How Did Urban Environmental Characteristics Influence Land Surface Temperature in Hong Kong from 2017 to 2022? Evidence from Remote Sensing and Land Use Data

“…However, these methods have limitations in capturing spatial variations because they provide non-spatialized results [39]. In overcoming this limitation, spatial analysis techniques, including spatial bivariate Moran's I and GWR, have been used [40]. For example, spatial bivariate Moran's I was used in Phoenix, Arizona, to explore the relationship between vegetation cover and seasonal surface temperature [41].…”