2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying the effects of vein mineralogy, thickness, and orientation on the strength of intact veined rock

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The influence of vein thickness on the mechanical behavior of both soft-and hard-veined granite was not pronounced (Figures 12b and 12c), which is in good agreement with the observation in a laboratory study (Turichshev & Hadjigeorgiou, 2017). The rupture pattern of the four soft-veined granite models shows high similarity in shape, except for the thickness of the shear bands (Figure 12b).…”
Section: 1029/2019jb019052supporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The influence of vein thickness on the mechanical behavior of both soft-and hard-veined granite was not pronounced (Figures 12b and 12c), which is in good agreement with the observation in a laboratory study (Turichshev & Hadjigeorgiou, 2017). The rupture pattern of the four soft-veined granite models shows high similarity in shape, except for the thickness of the shear bands (Figure 12b).…”
Section: 1029/2019jb019052supporting
confidence: 86%
“…This study also demonstrated that vein thickness had a negligible impact on the rupture characteristics of the veined models (Figure 12), irrespective of the vein strength. Vein orientation, on the contrary, exhibited a profound influence (Figure 13) on the rupture of the veined models, which was also observed in a laboratory test by Turichshev and Hadjigeorgiou (2017).…”
Section: Comparison Of Results With Previous Findings and Implicationsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, a direct comparison between our findings and the Laubscher and Jakubec (2001) method is not possible at this stage. Turichshev and Hadjigeorgiou (2017) demonstrated in their study that the peak strength of laboratory scale defected samples is strongly influenced by the vein mineralogy and thickness. For specimens with high volumetric content of ''hard'' minerals (i.e.…”
Section: Influence Of Defect Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, from an extensive laboratory dataset of different types of heterogenous rock samples with vein infilling ranging in Mohs hardness scale from 2 to 4, Bewick et al (2018) found that vein hardness played relatively minor role on the resulting UCS values supporting the nomogram developed by Laubscher and Jakubec (2001). Although there is limited data available, the studies from Turichshev and Hadjigeorgiou (2017) and Bewick et al (2018) possibly support the existence of a mineral hardness threshold of 4 that has been previously suggested by Brzovic and Villaescusa (2007). Regardless of these findings, as has been highlighted by Jakubec and Esterhuizen (2007), the proposed Mohs hardness scale for estimating the defect infill strength is only an empirical approach, and an effort should be made to better understand the strength contribution of these defects by means of laboratory experiments (e.g.…”
Section: Influence Of Defect Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%