2015
DOI: 10.1139/cjfas-2014-0253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying the effects of stream habitat on populations of breeding Pacific salmon

Abstract: Recognizing the mechanisms by which environmental conditions drive population dynamics can greatly benefit conservation and management. For example, reductions in densities of spawning Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) have received considerable attention, but the role of habitat characteristics on population sizes of breeding salmon is not fully understood. We studied relationships between habitat characteristics and stream population densities of spawning chum (Oncorhynchus keta) and pink (Oncorhynchus gorb… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The distributions of live pink and chum salmon were mediated by stream size, with the two species diverging in spawning distributions as stream size increased. Although these salmon species share similar spawning habitat requirements (Nelson et al, 2015), larger chum salmon may not be as limited in terms of suitable spawning habitat types. The larger size of chum salmon may enable them to access and successfully spawn in reaches with more variable discharge (Neave, 1966a), higher water velocities (Hale et al, 1985;Raleigh and Nelson, 1985), and larger spawning-substrate sizes (Hunter, 1959;DeVries, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distributions of live pink and chum salmon were mediated by stream size, with the two species diverging in spawning distributions as stream size increased. Although these salmon species share similar spawning habitat requirements (Nelson et al, 2015), larger chum salmon may not be as limited in terms of suitable spawning habitat types. The larger size of chum salmon may enable them to access and successfully spawn in reaches with more variable discharge (Neave, 1966a), higher water velocities (Hale et al, 1985;Raleigh and Nelson, 1985), and larger spawning-substrate sizes (Hunter, 1959;DeVries, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fukushima and Smoker (1998) suggested pink salmon spawned in shallower, steeper and faster flowing reaches than sockeye, but stopped short of concluding that this was a preference. Nelson et al (2015) suggested pink salmon spawning density was negatively related to riparian slope and positively related to woody debris in the river. Ultimately, pink salmon appear to pick spawning areas where interstitial gravel is well‐oxygenated.…”
Section: Synthesizing Pink Salmon Knowledge Between Pacific and Atlanticmentioning
confidence: 99%