2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2023.124143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying the effects of gap on the molten pool and porosity formation in laser butt welding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of weld seam quality and process stability, the gap size is of fundamental importance [3]. By affecting the energy absorption within the keyhole and the conditions of melt and vapor flow [4,5], the joint gap has a major impact on the pressure balance of the keyhole, which is crucial for keyhole stability [6]. As a result, the formation of weld imperfections (e.g., spatter, pores) can differ depending on the gap size [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In terms of weld seam quality and process stability, the gap size is of fundamental importance [3]. By affecting the energy absorption within the keyhole and the conditions of melt and vapor flow [4,5], the joint gap has a major impact on the pressure balance of the keyhole, which is crucial for keyhole stability [6]. As a result, the formation of weld imperfections (e.g., spatter, pores) can differ depending on the gap size [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By affecting the energy absorption within the keyhole and the conditions of melt and vapor flow [4,5], the joint gap has a major impact on the pressure balance of the keyhole, which is crucial for keyhole stability [6]. As a result, the formation of weld imperfections (e.g., spatter, pores) can differ depending on the gap size [4,5]. It can therefore be concluded that the detection This study addresses a significant gap in the field of laser beam butt welding, which is the absence of open-source datasets and the underexplored use of airborne acoustic analysis spanning from audible to ultrasonic ranges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%