2022
DOI: 10.1103/physrevfluids.7.103602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying the dynamic spreading of a molten sand droplet using multiphase mesoscopic simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inspired by the experimental results of Eddi et al (2013), the simulations of Koneru et al (2022) and the current simulations, we propose a simple sigmoid type dependence for α:…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Inspired by the experimental results of Eddi et al (2013), the simulations of Koneru et al (2022) and the current simulations, we propose a simple sigmoid type dependence for α:…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To simulate molten CMAS, the parameter mapping of Koneru et al (2022) was used together with the open-source code LAMMPS (Thompson et al 2022). In brief, the properties of molten CMAS at approximately 1260 • C, based on the experimental data from Naraparaju et al (2019), Bansal & Choi (2014) and Wiesner et al (2016), were used.…”
Section: Simulation Parameters and System Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Designing experimental configurations for achieving the seamless and uninterrupted 3D printing of diverse bioinks can prove to be both costly and time intensive. Since viscosity, surface forces between bioink, printhead, and PDMS and stage speed, all contribute towards high print fidelity, we developed a multiphase many-body dissipative particle dynamics (mDPD) model [18,19] to simulate the dynamic process of droplet bioprinting with a system setup shown in Figure 2A(i) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Designing experimental configurations for achieving the seamless and uninterrupted 3D printing of diverse bioinks can prove to be both costly and time intensive. Since viscosity, surface forces between bioink, printhead, and PDMS and stage speed, all contribute towards high print fidelity, we developed a multiphase many-body dissipative particle dynamics (mDPD) model [38,39] to simulate the dynamic process of droplet bioprinting with a system setup shown in figure 2(A(i)). Here, the bioink droplet of 50 µl with a viscosity of 4 mPa•s is used with printhead diameter (D) = 6.9 mm.…”
Section: Simulation Studies Of the Droplet Printing Processmentioning
confidence: 99%