2014
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)hy.1943-7900.0000850
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying the Dynamic Evolution of Graded Gravel Beds Using Particle Tracking Velocimetry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The flume is an 11.9 m long, 0.38 m deep and 0.44 m wide glass-sided open channel, with water and sediment recirculating capacity. A 1.1 m long acrylic sheet of 4 mm thickness is placed on the water surface to reduce refraction and the occurrence of water surface waves, as suggested by Heays et al (2014) and Fathel et al (2015). The camera is placed 0.44 m above the initial sand bed level and the field of view covers the width of the flume.…”
Section: Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flume is an 11.9 m long, 0.38 m deep and 0.44 m wide glass-sided open channel, with water and sediment recirculating capacity. A 1.1 m long acrylic sheet of 4 mm thickness is placed on the water surface to reduce refraction and the occurrence of water surface waves, as suggested by Heays et al (2014) and Fathel et al (2015). The camera is placed 0.44 m above the initial sand bed level and the field of view covers the width of the flume.…”
Section: Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former approach follows objects as they move, while the latter explores the process dynamics at prescribed locations. In the context of bed load sediment transport the two approaches correspond to following the trajectories of solid particles (e.g., Ancey et al, 2002;Campagnol et al, 2013;Fathel et al, 2015;Heays et al, 2014;Lajeunesse et al, 2010) and to characterizing the sediment transport properties at some place (e.g., Böhm et al, 2004;Garcia et al, 2007;Nelson et al, 1995;Radice et al, 2010Radice et al, , 2013, respectively. Typically, the Lagrangian approach is mostly used when dispersion of tracer particles comes into play (e.g., Campagnol et al, 2015;Fan et al, 2016;Fathel et al, 2016;Hassan et al, 2013;Lisle et al, 1998;Martin et al, 2012;Nikora et al, 2001Nikora et al, , 2002, whereas the Eulerian approach is employed for the investigation of sediment fluxes (e.g., Ballio et al, 2014;Cohen et al, 2010;Frey et al, 2003;Furbish, Haff, et al, 2012;Radice, 2009;Singh et al, 2009;Turowski, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Field studies inherently lack of a continuous record of particle locations that is needed to evaluate the diffusive character at different stages of particle motion. Even if this has now been made possible at the laboratory scale, the areal extent of the observed bed surface is usually restrained to a scale of tens of centimeters due to equipment constraints for image acquisition (Heays et al, ; Lajeunesse et al, ; Nikora et al, ; Tregnaghi, Bottacin‐Busolin, Tait, et al, ), thus the motions of particles that enter or leave the video sampling area are spatially censored (Fan et al, ; Fathel et al, ). Accurate reconstruction of particle trajectories is dependent on the frequency of the image acquisition, as a higher frame rate can support more accurate measurement of grain trajectories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%