2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106816
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying the direct and indirect effect of socio-psychological and behavioral factors on residential water conservation behavior and consumption in Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The intercept of MCSE career interest is represented by β 6. The path coefficients represented by γ indicate the effect of exogenous variable; the path coefficients represented by β indicate the effect of endogenous (latent or observed) variables [ 102 ] and ε represents the random error term in the equation [e.g., 103 ]. For example, β 1 PGM is the effect of PGM (endogenous observed variable) on AEB (endogenous latent variable); γ 1 Gender is the effect of gender (observed exogenous variable) on PGM (observed endogenous variable).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intercept of MCSE career interest is represented by β 6. The path coefficients represented by γ indicate the effect of exogenous variable; the path coefficients represented by β indicate the effect of endogenous (latent or observed) variables [ 102 ] and ε represents the random error term in the equation [e.g., 103 ]. For example, β 1 PGM is the effect of PGM (endogenous observed variable) on AEB (endogenous latent variable); γ 1 Gender is the effect of gender (observed exogenous variable) on PGM (observed endogenous variable).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In NAM, commitment, personal norms, and problem awareness stand as significant determinants in generating pro-social activity (Schwartz, 1977). A lot of recent research has used the norm activation model framework to look at how personal norms (PN) affect behavior in different psychological, environmental, and behavioral settings (Kim & Hwang, 2020;Asadi et al, 2021;Savari et al, 2021;Arkorful, 2022;Ho & Tang, 2022;Javid et al, 2022;Obuobi et al, 2022;Song et al, 2022;Maminirina et al, 2023;Singha et al, 2023). However, (Bamberg et al, 2007) suggest that the norm activation model is well-suited to explaining pro-social or altruistic behavior, while the theory of planned behavior is better for describing the self-interest role in pro-environmental behavior.…”
Section: An Overview Of the Strengths And Limitations Of The Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ascription of responsibility (AR) denotes the perception that one is accountable for the severe repercussions that result from failing to behave pragmatically; personal norm (PN) pertains to the ethical obligation to either do or abstain from a particular activity. The norm activation model (NAM), for explaining pro-environmental and prosocial activities are used by the current literature (e.g., Kim & Hwang, 2020;Asadi et al, 2021;Savari et al, 2021;Ho & Tang, 2022;Javid et al, 2022;Arkorful, 2022;Obuobi et al, 2022;Maminirina et al, 2023;Singha et al, 2023;Song et al, 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Psychological variables positively associated with pro-environmental behaviors include willingness to sacrifice, perceived behavioral control, subjective norms, and green self-identity (Hansmann et al, 2020). Other types of relevant factors include socio-economic variables (Blankenberg and Alhusen, 2018), demographic factors such as family structure (Singha et al, 2023), political attitudes (Korfiatis et al, 2004), as well as behavioral factors such as habits (Singha et al, 2023). Importantly, the literature has found that some of these factors are related to the perceived benefits of the environmental behaviors (Hansmann et al, 2020).…”
Section: The Endogeneity Of the Targeted Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%