2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10404-022-02544-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying the dielectrophoretic force on colloidal particles in microfluidic devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Microfluidic chips enhanced with active particle manipulation methods use at least one force other than hydrodynamic forces to manipulate cells. Methods based on magnetic [29][30][31][32][33][34], electric [35][36][37][38], acoustic [39][40][41][42][43], and optical forces [44][45][46][47][48], each of which, with their advantages and disadvantages, have been developed. In general, the active methods are rather more complicated than the passive methods; however, they typically offer more precise control of individual cells.…”
Section: Active Cell Manipulation Microfluidicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microfluidic chips enhanced with active particle manipulation methods use at least one force other than hydrodynamic forces to manipulate cells. Methods based on magnetic [29][30][31][32][33][34], electric [35][36][37][38], acoustic [39][40][41][42][43], and optical forces [44][45][46][47][48], each of which, with their advantages and disadvantages, have been developed. In general, the active methods are rather more complicated than the passive methods; however, they typically offer more precise control of individual cells.…”
Section: Active Cell Manipulation Microfluidicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, there is a need for real-time on-site biosensors to detect antibiotics in dairy milk. Such real-time and on-site requirements can be realized through microfluidic devices 8,9,10 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the approach for generating the non-uniform electric field, DEP technology can be further categorized into electrode DEP (eDEP) and insulator-based DEP (iDEP) [19]. With the rapid progress of micro-and nanofabrication, several types of electrodes have been designed, such as quadrupole electrodes [20], interdigitated electrodes [21], virtual electrodes [22] and liquid-metal based electrodes [23], contributing to the successful application of the eDEP technique in diverse microfluidic and nanofluidic fields [24]. On the other hand, iDEP relies on the existence of insulated obstacles in the aqueous solution system to generate a non-uniform electric field under the DC voltage signal, giving it the advantages of simple fabrication and high cost-effectiveness [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%