2022
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191912628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying the Carbon Reduction Potential of Recycling Construction Waste Based on Life Cycle Assessment: A Case of Jiangsu Province

Abstract: The recycling of construction waste is key to reducing waste generation and CO2 emissions. This study aimed to develop a quantitative model for analyzing the carbon reduction potential of recycling construction, demolition, and renovation waste (CDRW) in Jiangsu province. The waste generation rate calculation method and nonlinear autoregressive artificial neural network model were used to estimate and predict CDRW generation. The life cycle assessment was performed to calculate the carbon reduction potential o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison with the previous study, Broadbent [43] examined the advantages of recycling steel using the LCA approach and discovered that for every kilogramme of steel scrap recycled at the EOL phases, 1.5 kg of carbon emissions, 13.4 MJ of primary energy, and 1.4 kg of iron ore are avoided. Liu et al [67] quantified the carbon reduction potential of recycling construction waste in Jiangsu Province, China. According to their findings, recycling steel in the given scenario greatly reduces CO2 emissions, accounting for 39.48% of the possible reduction in carbon emissions.…”
Section: Comparison Between Environmental Impacts Of Current Steel Re...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison with the previous study, Broadbent [43] examined the advantages of recycling steel using the LCA approach and discovered that for every kilogramme of steel scrap recycled at the EOL phases, 1.5 kg of carbon emissions, 13.4 MJ of primary energy, and 1.4 kg of iron ore are avoided. Liu et al [67] quantified the carbon reduction potential of recycling construction waste in Jiangsu Province, China. According to their findings, recycling steel in the given scenario greatly reduces CO2 emissions, accounting for 39.48% of the possible reduction in carbon emissions.…”
Section: Comparison Between Environmental Impacts Of Current Steel Re...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It divides the cycle into six stages: raw material acquisition, material processing, component production, construction, building operation and maintenance, and demolition. Especially for the bridge demolition stage, a decisive factor in the carbon emission quantity is the demolition method [5]. Recently, various demolition methods have been proposed and applied, from blasting to static cutting, gradually reducing the impact on the environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Waste management is currently a highly analyzed and discussed topic [1][2][3][4][5]. This is because economic, civilizational and social development generates not only better living conditions, but also many adverse side effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%