2018
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty1064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying the AGN-driven outflows in ULIRGs (QUADROS) – II. Evidence for compact outflow regions from HST [O III] imaging observations

Abstract: The true importance of the warm, AGN-driven outflows for the evolution of galaxies remains uncertain. Measurements of the radial extents of the outflows are key for quantifying their masses and kinetic powers, and also establishing whether the AGN outflows are galaxy-wide. Therefore, as part of a larger project to investigate the significance of warm, AGN-driven outflows in the most rapidly evolving galaxies in the local universe, here we present deep Hubble Space Telescope (HST) narrow-band [OIII]λ5007 observ… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
40
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
6
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To summarise, in cases where we can measure the radial extents of the warm outflows in the CSS and GPS objects using HST narrow-band imaging or X-shooter spectro-astrometry, we find that they are relatively compact -within a factor of 2 of the radio source extents -and fall in the range 0.06 < r < 1.9 kpc. Interestingly, this range is similar to that measured for the warm outflows in nearby ultraluminous infrared galaxies (ULIRGs) by Rose et al (2018), Spence et al (2018) and Tadhunter et al (2018), despite the fact that the outflows in CSS and GPS source are likely to be driven by the radio jets, whereas those in the most ULIRGs are probably driven by hot winds accelerated by radiation pressure close to the AGN. In subsequent calculations of the general properties of the warm outflows we use the best available outflow radius estimate available for each object, as derived using the technique indicated in the final column of Table 7.…”
Section: Objectsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To summarise, in cases where we can measure the radial extents of the warm outflows in the CSS and GPS objects using HST narrow-band imaging or X-shooter spectro-astrometry, we find that they are relatively compact -within a factor of 2 of the radio source extents -and fall in the range 0.06 < r < 1.9 kpc. Interestingly, this range is similar to that measured for the warm outflows in nearby ultraluminous infrared galaxies (ULIRGs) by Rose et al (2018), Spence et al (2018) and Tadhunter et al (2018), despite the fact that the outflows in CSS and GPS source are likely to be driven by the radio jets, whereas those in the most ULIRGs are probably driven by hot winds accelerated by radiation pressure close to the AGN. In subsequent calculations of the general properties of the warm outflows we use the best available outflow radius estimate available for each object, as derived using the technique indicated in the final column of Table 7.…”
Section: Objectsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…On the other hand, in "quasar mode" feedback, the outflows driven by radiatively efficient AGN act to heat and expel the pre-existing cooler gas in the host galaxies that would otherwise form stars. The range of radial scales over which this form of feedback operates is currently controversial, with estimates ranging from tens of pc to >10 kpc (Greene et al 2012;Harrison et al 2012Harrison et al , 2014Liu et al 2013;Husemann et al 2016;Villar-Martín et al 2016;Tadhunter et al 2018;Revalski et al 2018;Fischer et al 2018; Baron & Netzer 2019a). Although this feedback mode is often linked to winds driven by the radiation pressure of the central AGN (King & Pounds 2015), relativistic jets may play a significant role, even in cases in which the radio luminosity is relatively modest (L 1.4 GHz < 10 24 W Hz −1 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be partially related to differences in the definition of the wind location, which we further discuss in section 5.1. The distribution is more consistent with wind location estimates that are based on HST observations, or studies that correct for beam-smearing in seeing-limited observations (e.g., Husemann et al 2016;Villar-Martín et al 2016;Fischer et al 2018;Tadhunter et al 2018).…”
Section: Wind Locationsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Some studies reported ubiquitous outflow sizes of several kpc scales (e.g. Harrison et al 2014;McElroy et al 2015;Liu et al 2013a,b), but recently much lower outflow sizes of <1 kpc were reported in several studies (Husemann et al 2016a;Villar-Martín et al 2016;Tadhunter et al 2018; Baron & Netzer 2019). The difference may partially be explained due to the effect of beam smearing in seeing-limited observations (Husemann et al 2016a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%