2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0344-0338(04)80508-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying telomere lengths of human individual chromosome arms by centromere-calibrated fluorescence in situ hybridisation and digital imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reliability and limitations of PNA-FISH-based telomere length measurements using the same equipment which was used here, have recently been discussed in detail (Perner et al, 2003). Facing the interchromosomal (Londono-Vallejo et al, 2001), the intercellular, and the interindividual (Lansdorp et al, 1996;Perner et al, 2003) variation of telomere lengths which could also be confirmed in the present study, differences of telomere lengths should be rather clear to be statistically significant. For instance, the comparison of p-and q-arm telomeres of the normal chromosomes of the cell line examined here did not yield the differences which were found in mouse chromosomes (Modino and Slijepcevic, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The reliability and limitations of PNA-FISH-based telomere length measurements using the same equipment which was used here, have recently been discussed in detail (Perner et al, 2003). Facing the interchromosomal (Londono-Vallejo et al, 2001), the intercellular, and the interindividual (Lansdorp et al, 1996;Perner et al, 2003) variation of telomere lengths which could also be confirmed in the present study, differences of telomere lengths should be rather clear to be statistically significant. For instance, the comparison of p-and q-arm telomeres of the normal chromosomes of the cell line examined here did not yield the differences which were found in mouse chromosomes (Modino and Slijepcevic, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…All figures, therefore, are given as percentage of 2cen fluorescence intensity. The technical details of telomere analysis by this system have been described previously by others (Perner et al, 2003). Because of the limitations of the evaluation system, normal chromosomes and marker chromosomes had to be karyotyped and evaluated separately from identical metaphases.…”
Section: Microscopic Detection and Image Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation