2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.12.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying success after total shoulder arthroplasty: the substantial clinical benefit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
76
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Werner et al 24 subtracted the mean change of ASES score of those reporting "no change" and "somewhat dissatisfied" from the mean change of ASES score of those who had reported "very satisfied" and measured the SCB associated with the overall satisfaction with surgery (SCB = 37.4), ability to do housework/yardwork (SCB = 21.6), and recreational activities (SCB = 19.2) at 2 years post arthroplasty. Simovitch et al 19 calculated the SCB as the mean difference between the unchanged group "no change/worse" and the changed group "much better" and reported SCB values of 31.5 and 19.1 for substantial overall satisfaction in the ASES and CMS, respectively, at the minimum of 2 years. The results of the SCB values of the ASES by the previous studies are more consistent with our findings at 6 months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Werner et al 24 subtracted the mean change of ASES score of those reporting "no change" and "somewhat dissatisfied" from the mean change of ASES score of those who had reported "very satisfied" and measured the SCB associated with the overall satisfaction with surgery (SCB = 37.4), ability to do housework/yardwork (SCB = 21.6), and recreational activities (SCB = 19.2) at 2 years post arthroplasty. Simovitch et al 19 calculated the SCB as the mean difference between the unchanged group "no change/worse" and the changed group "much better" and reported SCB values of 31.5 and 19.1 for substantial overall satisfaction in the ASES and CMS, respectively, at the minimum of 2 years. The results of the SCB values of the ASES by the previous studies are more consistent with our findings at 6 months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lowest SCB change reported in the literature is 19 points for the CMS. 19 By choosing an estimated standard deviation of 10 and a small effect size of 0.2, 39 using the below formula for one group (paired t-test), a minimum of 43 patients with complete data (N ={(Za–Zb)SD/d} 2 where a = 0.05, Za = 1.65, b = 0.20, Zb = 0.84, SD = 2, d = 0.2 × 19 = 3.8, N ={(1.65 + 0.84) 10/3.8} 2 = 43) is required to detect substantial change over time. Descriptive analyses of patient characteristics and initial outcome measure summary scores of a convenient sample were performed and compared between 6 months and 2 years.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3 Substantial clinical benefit (SCB) is a similar concept to the MCID except the difference in change scores is between no change and substantial change on an anchor question instead of the difference between no change and minimal change, which is used for the MCID. 4 The maximal outcome improvement (MOI) is a threshold for an outcome measure normalized to the maximal possible improvement for each patient beyond which a patient is considered to have achieved a satisfactory result. 5 So, what are the upsides and downsides of each metric?…”
Section: See Related Article On Page 1805mentioning
confidence: 99%