Proceedings 2011 IEEE International Conference on Spatial Data Mining and Geographical Knowledge Services 2011
DOI: 10.1109/icsdm.2011.5969031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying spatial heterogeneity of Coniferous trees in ATM, CASI and Eagle airborne images

Abstract: Spatial heterogeneity of airborne remote sensing images is critical for surface character delineation. The purpose of this paper is to quantify and evaluate the spatial variability and characteristic scales of Coniferous trees from multi-sensor airborne images by applying variogram modelling. The Airborne Thematic Mapper (ATM) Compact Airborne Spectrographic Imager (CASI-2), Specim AISA Eagle airborne images at Harwood, Northumberland, UK, were utilized, with spatial resolutions of 9m, 7.2m and 2.5m respective… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to Qiu et al's study (20), the nugget effect (nugget:sill ratio) was fairly small. Very small nugget effect was obtained in Eagle airborne images.…”
Section: Overall Spatial Variabilitycontrasting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Compared to Qiu et al's study (20), the nugget effect (nugget:sill ratio) was fairly small. Very small nugget effect was obtained in Eagle airborne images.…”
Section: Overall Spatial Variabilitycontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…Only for grass and urban landscapes in blue and green bands, the total spatial variability of CASI airborne images was slightly stronger than that of ATM airborne images. Compared with Qiu et al's study (20), it seems that the spatial variability of ATM airborne images almost keep unchanged when the spatial resolution varies from 9 to 6 m.…”
Section: Overall Spatial Variabilitycontrasting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation