2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2018.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying snow drift on Arctic structures: A case study at Summit, Greenland, using UAV-based structure-from-motion photogrammetry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the study period, snowfall was manually documented when visual snowfall was observed or physical snowfall was collected (Appendix Table A1; snow collection setup described in Steen-Larsen et al, 2014). We use this simple, manual documentation of snowfall as well as the ERA5 snowfall product from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF, 2017;Hersbach et al, 2020) to obtain information about the time of snowfall events. ERA5 is increasingly used and provides reliable near-surface variables over the Greenland Ice Sheet (Delhasse et al, 2020).…”
Section: Additional Snow Height and Snowfall Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During the study period, snowfall was manually documented when visual snowfall was observed or physical snowfall was collected (Appendix Table A1; snow collection setup described in Steen-Larsen et al, 2014). We use this simple, manual documentation of snowfall as well as the ERA5 snowfall product from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF, 2017;Hersbach et al, 2020) to obtain information about the time of snowfall events. ERA5 is increasingly used and provides reliable near-surface variables over the Greenland Ice Sheet (Delhasse et al, 2020).…”
Section: Additional Snow Height and Snowfall Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baltsavias et al, 2001), drones (e.g. Hawley and Millstein, 2019), or lidar operations (e.g. Deems et al, 2013).…”
Section: Sfm Photogrammetry As An Efficient Surface Snow Monitoring Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It does not require a permanent power supply, which can be a limiting factor for laser scanners and snow height sensors. No specific training for users is needed as is required for airborne studies with aircraft (e.g., Baltsavias et al, 2001), drones (e.g., Hawley and Millstein, 2019) or LiDAR operations (e.g., Deems et al, 2013). Even though our approach is limited by light availability and visual contrasts, which is also reported in many studies (e.g., Nolan et al, 2015;Harder et al, 2016;Cimoli et al, 2017), it has the advantage of being very easy to operate and that it can be used at other study sites without great effort.…”
Section: Surface Roughnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10] used UAV-SfM and Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) data to determine and monitor topographic changes. [11] used UAV-SfM to create a DEM. The resulting DEM has been used for calculation of drift volume in quantifying snow drift on Arctic structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%